From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Moving packages out of core to ELPA Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 21:20:22 +0200 Message-ID: <86sf1qsxs9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <865xynt2x9.fsf@gnu.org> <0F8ED939-346F-43F8-B798-AF0D38A02E06@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28809"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: JD Smith Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 17 20:21:20 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rbQFT-0007Iq-I7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 20:21:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rbQEd-0008H2-CX; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 14:20:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rbQEb-0008Gh-Kn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 14:20:25 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rbQEb-0003e2-CQ; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 14:20:25 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=/2Of9nHN2CrAxvhu8b0EZO/Wsb1nF25P1QW97IrqrAc=; b=bonNK/F1m3eDf2tzHKKq /iuddgelBPWitJKOn6Q9EQ1r4I4OWcbriAcPzwctbgAMLxIDHxT0PNGUR0MmjgubK6Fby3fvxKk5e 6Mb5XYpbKJZC05Zkg9Hcks/cy2b+lS7nROXcF5uHgCnFdvvbr1emGi25Wj19Uw86zNJFBKgNDt+uD HSK1buqNzSIC9uP1Z1vlw9dVzlxr7apI7Ncua0Cg9S6OmVAxC4YvgTcnaX7Ua/Pjeh/qq3sKbsi8X O8mjlGycXyRDPVaDhUxy4ldX/86HILOiLCMeenS7gkOj4Us6XToz4NQePhPtqcyoyhcmf27x5Mmbn p3Mvk2dnjaE1Tw==; In-Reply-To: <0F8ED939-346F-43F8-B798-AF0D38A02E06@gmail.com> (message from JD Smith on Sat, 17 Feb 2024 13:52:44 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:316283 Archived-At: > From: JD Smith > Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 13:52:44 -0500 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > On Feb 17, 2024, at 12:29 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > And in this case, we intend to move IDLWAVE out precisely because it is obsolete, > > Not necessarily, depending on how one defines obsolete. Just “no longer worth keeping in core”. That's not my interpretation of your description of IDL state. I think "no longer worth keeping in core" is the conclusion, not the reason. The reason is that IDL is obsolete and rarely if ever used nowadays.