Re: URGENT - which-key FSF contributor status

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
> Cc: jb@jeremybryant.net,  justin@burkett.cc,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:49:47 +0000
> 
> >> The :version tags of the defcustoms and deffaces will need to change.
> >
> > I can change the current tags to :package-version and also add :version
> > "30.1" tags.
> 
> This has been done.
> 
> >> Some faces use attributes such as underline or bold without testing
> >> for their availability first and without offering any fallbacks if
> >> they aren't.  Is it okay to have those displayed using the default
> >> face?
> >
> > My guess is that this is just decoration, but someone who actually uses
> > which-key should comment on that.  Specifically it appears to involve
> > the
> >
> > - which-key-special-key-face
> > - which-key-highlighted-command-face
> 
> I think that it should be OK for 'which-key-special-key-face' to use
> :bold, because it is accompanied by :inverse-video that carries most of
> the visual effect.
> 
> As for 'which-key-highlighted-command-face', I have removed the
> :underline and instead let it inherit from 'highlight'.  I hope nobody
> objects to that.  By default it doesn't make any difference, as it only
> affects people who have customised 'which-key-highlighted-command-list'.
> 
> IMO we could merge the branch into master.

Thanks, I think it's okay to land this on master.