From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CVS is the `released version' Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 15:36:01 +0200 Message-ID: <86r6p9c75q.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> References: <2cd46e7f0705101124r72000f78xdf05d18ca815ca57@mail.gmail.com> <17991.47259.210100.801472@localhost.localdomain> <1179753516.46519c2c07a7c@webmail.freedom2surf.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1179841010 24327 80.91.229.12 (22 May 2007 13:36:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 13:36:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: bob@rattlesnake.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 22 15:36:47 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HqUXe-0004Uu-6L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 May 2007 15:36:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HqUXe-0006Ul-V9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 May 2007 09:36:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HqUWz-0006A5-L3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2007 09:36:05 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HqUWx-00069A-Cc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2007 09:36:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HqUWx-000695-5Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2007 09:36:03 -0400 Original-Received: from pc3.berlin.powerweb.de ([62.67.228.11]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HqUWw-0002vQ-K1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2007 09:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from quinscape.de (dslnet.212-29-44.ip210.dokom.de [212.29.44.210] (may be forged)) by pc3.berlin.powerweb.de (8.9.3p3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA17736 for ; Tue, 22 May 2007 15:35:55 +0200 X-Delivered-To: Original-Received: (qmail 28050 invoked from network); 22 May 2007 13:36:01 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO lola.quinscape.zz) ([10.0.3.43]) (envelope-sender ) by ns.quinscape.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 22 May 2007 13:36:01 -0000 Original-Received: by lola.quinscape.zz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6514D8F9DD; Tue, 22 May 2007 15:36:01 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Robert J. Chassell's message of "Tue\, 22 May 2007 07\:18\:26 -0400 \(EDT\)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.51 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:71599 Archived-At: "Robert J. Chassell" writes: > Then I have no idea what scenario you have in mind where package.el makes > any difference. > > Suppose a program in the package repository has been placed there in > order to hurt? And how would that hurt? > Most people and their organizations are good, but not all. > > Bear in mind, a statement on the program that `this is licensed under > the GPL' does not count. Could you please explain what the problem is that you are talking about? -- David Kastrup