From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.orgmode Subject: Re: [FR] Allow flattened imenu index Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2023 19:37:44 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86r0jv8efr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <87plzgbalt.fsf@localhost> <87msujskxg.fsf@localhost> <835y17y5qu.fsf@gnu.org> <874jgrsiyy.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24377"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Morgan.J.Smith@outlook.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, 58131@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 09 18:39:39 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rC1Ih-0006Bx-O1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 18:39:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rC1IN-0000fi-Tj; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 12:39:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rC1IL-0000fL-Jx; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 12:39:17 -0500 Original-Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:dc4:8::225]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rC1IJ-0005iY-1X; Sat, 09 Dec 2023 12:39:16 -0500 Original-Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 299131C0002; Sat, 9 Dec 2023 17:39:08 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <874jgrsiyy.fsf@localhost> (Ihor Radchenko's message of "Sat, 09 Dec 2023 11:39:33 +0000") X-GND-Sasl: juri@linkov.net Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:4b98:dc4:8::225; envelope-from=juri@linkov.net; helo=relay5-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:313644 gmane.emacs.orgmode:158510 Archived-At: > Normally, `imenu' supports nested menus, when users select the target > location in steps, like item3 -> item3.1 -> ... > > What is proposed is to list all the sub-menus together, as an option, so > that the users can choose, for example, item.3.1 directly, without going > through parent item3. Shouldn't each sub-item keep the parent menu item as a prefix? So a nested menu like menu1 sub-item1 sub-item2 could be flattened to menu1 -> sub-item1 menu1 -> sub-item2 Or this should be optional?