From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Accidental change of behaviour for electric-layout-mode? Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2024 13:13:17 +0300 Message-ID: <86r08ux3gi.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wmj2dr4q.fsf@ice9.digital> <86v7yle1ma.fsf@gnu.org> <86cyktdx68.fsf@gnu.org> <871q18op24.fsf@ice9.digital> <86msjwdgcq.fsf@gnu.org> <87r098n8n5.fsf@ice9.digital> <86jzf0c6rw.fsf@gnu.org> <87h6a37sh0.fsf@ice9.digital> <86tte3bu9x.fsf@gnu.org> <874j5tkvfm.fsf@ice9.digital> <861q0xysb8.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17924"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: morgan@ice9.digital Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 05 12:14:05 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sx1nZ-0004Xa-Mv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 05 Oct 2024 12:14:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sx1mt-0007AU-Lv; Sat, 05 Oct 2024 06:13:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sx1ms-0007AH-DT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Oct 2024 06:13:22 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sx1mr-00018f-A4; Sat, 05 Oct 2024 06:13:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=UeRS8Hvq1vPx+MIsFSq2rjKxTYLPAjLyJHUJ0WbJ2ss=; b=oBORM8hlNgM9 nahLV6TeEn/rkbpNyRKME5qZVH6Nkcu3z9M0i0bmkLAlOE0uU4McV1meqZGsFbX5y2GktczieiWI4 zpSwYf1HPg7wfA9/jLvJ1OjJiBUCqzDRWhJbMb04p05CvSUczZF+SOFSWYDXjS83fMBsGos1mFkb+ 0yDEQ0pmSz8V2HuqtFvCxCHGdvI7Wo8S2oVmzWEpYK9pvOaKXkhqdYWRsOBn8V4JOg+6XoKpWnL8A Fi+tPiJka2pqpARvc8Z0MwcKJi67BMGX+hmwtprubnWvSD8UsAaHqSNf2m8xYuFKqqyxlCzLGIRNo ZRdjDOKPHZdrA0KNqNLCKg==; In-Reply-To: <861q0xysb8.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Thu, 03 Oct 2024 21:06:35 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:324331 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2024 21:06:35 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > From: Morgan Willcock > > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2024 17:22:53 +0100 > > > > Possibly it depends on whether there will be an additional pretest > > release or not? If there was going to be one and it was accompanied by > > a note to re-test any changes which were made to electric-layout-mode > > rules, that might be enough. > > Unfortunately, doing this does not guarantee enough people will try > the changed behavior, and so the relatively short time we still have > until the release (even though there definitely will be one more > pretest) doesn't allow us to make sure we can safely change the > behavior at this late stage. I've now installed your original patch on the emacs-30 branch, thanks.