From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master b0ba0d42b0f: * src/lisp.h (EQ): Improve generated code. Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 17:00:22 +0200 Message-ID: <86r06vcsjd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <173279015204.1017853.4020802222494409378@vcs3.savannah.gnu.org> <20241128103552.86CC34F4FDB@vcs3.savannah.gnu.org> <86ttbrctag.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6769"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: pipcet@protonmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 28 16:01:01 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tGg0q-0001T1-KN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 16:01:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tGg0Q-00073U-M4; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 10:00:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tGg0O-00073J-Qr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 10:00:32 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tGg0O-00042O-IH; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 10:00:32 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=QAzsW0q5JZQELtb4sRsxtAtaUJ2qMXD76K9YZvlY+Vo=; b=F16RYqVPXEE/ xBed/Zc9Q3Qsl6P/wtKXz+wLZNF+87nwW1kD5zEKjs+u270mnDzK6VV8RqqfPKQ2ZI15uQsugegRr 1EGs39jzNCAumXRQyzdt5hpZ7dVmO5N1CRjWBaaq8rNViP6fCRmVyCrWgab7aXtusDybPRx6FaAZv 5vOAzrVKpmlS4sa1wkEtOHxInage5706epaWqwQweasKgQZuVAjYp2XJWSWF2ZIut0j94DDi1C4ql /ZFVZFeTcWiaqgecEgJ83GeOvDsk8dAimtfzkFP+bMbXmFKureFFvAqAL7HxYEKEwi40CvBSWf0a2 4XBctxHyDLq+8vDo9hP7yA==; In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Thu, 28 Nov 2024 09:55:34 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:325820 Archived-At: > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: Pip Cet , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 09:55:34 -0500 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > I think we should us __builtin_expect only when building with GCC, > > indeed. > > AFAICS config.h defines __builtin_expect to a nop if the used compiler > does not support it, am I wrong? Ah, you are right, sorry.