From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Brinkhoff Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: User-defined record types, v2 Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:55:14 +0100 Organization: nocrew Message-ID: <86pohbosxp.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> References: <86y3w2tt2n.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1490090170 31173 195.159.176.226 (21 Mar 2017 09:56:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 09:56:10 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 21 10:56:06 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cqGWE-00071N-Me for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:55:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38426 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqGWK-0000E1-Kz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 05:56:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33573) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqGVl-0000Dv-7s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 05:55:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqGVh-0002wh-Db for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 05:55:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=39249 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqGVh-0002vV-6I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 05:55:25 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cqGVV-0002pY-GA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:55:13 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 26 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:hNEUxMWG1MHE25NPQf5whjftvPg= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:213195 Archived-At: There are three remaining failures in the test suite. I'm looking into them. One of them is quite puzzling to me, and may require some EIEIO insights. In a fresh Emacs instance, define a class with a class allocation slot: (require 'eieio) (defclass foo () ((x :initarg :emu :initform emu :allocation :class :accessor get-foo))) Now, this will fail: (progn (get-foo (foo)) (get-foo 'foo)) However, if you restart Emacs and define the class again, this will work: (progn (get-foo 'foo) (get-foo (foo))) As far as I can see, in the failing case, (get-foo 'foo) will enter the method with the foo specializer. In the other case it correctly enters the method with the (subclass foo) specializer.