From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Future release of emacs-26 Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 16:03:37 -0800 Message-ID: <86pnoi54me.fsf@stephe-leake.org> References: <871s1ent89.fsf@gmail.com> <87pnovlr5z.fsf@gmail.com> <83k1f3k3rm.fsf@gnu.org> <87y339g9g7.fsf_-_@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="184314"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (windows-nt) To: emacs-devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 17 02:04:01 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hRQLw-000lmS-01 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 02:04:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38642 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRQLu-0002DV-0H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 20:03:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48006) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRQLk-0002DP-RC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 20:03:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRQLj-00085B-UV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 20:03:48 -0400 Original-Received: from gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([67.222.33.93]:58819) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRQLj-000816-PZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 20:03:47 -0400 Original-Received: from cmgw10.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.9.0.10]) by gproxy8.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 869531AB055 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 18:03:41 -0600 (MDT) Original-Received: from host114.hostmonster.com ([74.220.207.114]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id RQLdhmU7AsFwgRQLdhl9E7; Thu, 16 May 2019 18:03:41 -0600 X-Authority-Reason: nr=8 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=Cb8mGojl c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=CQdxDb2CKd3SRg4I0/XZPQ==:117 a=CQdxDb2CKd3SRg4I0/XZPQ==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=E5NmQfObTbMA:10:nop_rcvd_month_year a=fS3SwVQ_UaQA:10:endurance_base64_authed_username_1 a=iRZporoAAAAA:8 a=ZL7JOJe-T1zWMcM-XJYA:9 a=NOBgFS-JBQ2l-kSd6-zu:22 Original-Received: from [76.77.182.20] (port=50445 helo=Takver4) by host114.hostmonster.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1hRQLd-0018m6-9v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 18:03:41 -0600 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 14 May 2019 21:27:06 -0400") X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host114.hostmonster.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - stephe-leake.org X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 76.77.182.20 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1hRQLd-0018m6-9v X-Source-Sender: (Takver4) [76.77.182.20]:50445 X-Source-Auth: stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org X-Email-Count: 1 X-Source-Cap: c3RlcGhlbGU7c3RlcGhlbGU7aG9zdDExNC5ob3N0bW9uc3Rlci5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 67.222.33.93 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236610 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > No, this setting is to make it easier for the other ELPA archives which > (AFAIK) don't sign their packages (and in any case, Emacs doesn't come > with the keys for those). Perhaps package-check-signatures should be per-repository, so we are warned when the Gnu ELPA signature check fails. -- -- Stephe