Re: Submitting treesit-fold to GNU ELPA (was: [NonGNU ELPA] Submitting treesit-fold to NonGNU ELPA)

["Elijah G." <eg642616@gmail.com>]

Jen-Chieh Shen <jcs090218@gmail.com> writes:

>> I'would also like that the pacakge can get into GNU ELPA, but IMO the
>> problem would be the contributions since i think it could limit it
>> (due paperwork), also since this package is a fork of another
>> one [ts-fold][https://github.com/emacs-tree-sitter/ts-fold] i don't know
>> if it could be a problem, Jen-Chieh what do you think about this?.
>
> I am unsure since I have not submitted packages to GNU ELPA or non-GNU ELPA.
> As seven people (including myself) have made contributions to more than 15 LOC,
> I assumed we would need to get them all to sign the paperwork.

Sure, opening a issue for calling them for the paperwork.
The _Advantage_ of submit it to GNU ELPA is that it can get into emacs-30/31
(since there is interest for merge it into core as far as i can see).

> - jcs090218 (+12,214/-8,638) - signed
> - Junyi Hou (+402/-39)
> - Nidish96 (+215/-107)
> - samrjack (+567/-258)
> - DevelopmentCool2449 (+434/-360)

```diff
-- DevelopmentCool2449 (+434/-360)
+- DevelopmentCool2449 (+434/-360) - signed
```

DevelopmentCool2449 has already signed paperwork since it's me :-).

-- 
E.G. from Gnus The Emacs Newsreader and E-mail client