From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs project mission (was Re: "If you're still seeing problems, please reopen." [ Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 05:15:38 +0100 Message-ID: <86o8wqkpsl.fsf@zoho.eu> References: <20191117113054.49837.qmail@mail.muc.de> <87bltaz9g4.fsf@telefonica.net> <834kz25qp9.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2wexsv1.fsf@telefonica.net> <20191118175639.08d02820@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <874kz0pa9y.fsf@gnus.org> <87sgmjyn60.fsf@gmx.de> <87imnezyt5.fsf@gmx.de> <481a1f16-d661-0f96-2f45-3d5ec9c1132e@yandex.ru> <749d3c85-ecd0-5d4e-b9fc-6405c2ca2334@yandex.ru> <831rtmn37r.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Emanuel Berg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="32744"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 03 05:17:23 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ibzcm-0008Le-Bs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 05:17:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48236 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ibzcj-00006Q-US for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 23:17:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51317) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ibzbT-0008U1-Fh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 23:16:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ibzbS-0004K6-3f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 23:15:59 -0500 Original-Received: from 195-159-176-226.customer.powertech.no ([195.159.176.226]:41766 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ibzbR-0004GA-E5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 23:15:57 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ibzbI-0006pt-2Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 05:15:48 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:Nya5MvxPDQ5TtvtqzrmlkbPc80g= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:243029 Archived-At: Jean-Christophe Helary wrote: >> So what does all that mean in terms of >> improving the UX of bug reporting? We could >> add a short checklist "for the impatient" >> right at the beginning of the chapter, > > Yes !!! Well, do that by all means but I think focus should be on the *Bug Help* buffer and/or the actual mail as that is the only thing the really impatient will ever see. -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 https://dataswamp.org/~incal