From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MPS: Win64 testers? Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 19:08:21 +0300 Message-ID: <86o75jp6h6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bk1k8mzd.fsf@protonmail.com> <861q2gs8xu.fsf@gnu.org> <877cc88j4p.fsf@protonmail.com> <86seuvre6x.fsf@gnu.org> <8734mv8yb6.fsf@protonmail.com> <8634mvqte0.fsf@gnu.org> <87jzg773ka.fsf@protonmail.com> <86seuvpar5.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39332"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: pipcet@protonmail.com, sebastian@sebasmonia.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, yantar92@posteo.net To: Quang Kien Nguyen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 23 18:08:54 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1shWqM-000A7U-EX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 18:08:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1shWpw-0001Yl-HX; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 12:08:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1shWpu-0001YS-Ks for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 12:08:26 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1shWpu-0003PV-AR; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 12:08:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=9whV4KUmvgyAtxEtiP3w7b5Z/mpIRoZ+KhPTaZ124wU=; b=SOUpLQUzHIbz zjIXgq0UFspxWRXBp37adbP3r4mJwEHACfpBhXnmukboLViF5LN66Z6d9GRyfVZ7ZwkcL4MD33dZT axmBGOGwCahehVoOZqyji/d+Y0m9Yz7B0oiaaXJnALbzkp+oKQrzimaChPOyMVkhEXlswOPMWv3zD yhMOMZBMRRIAbDoek0jGC7OsBARVsl7JjoFVLE8c5dKRus59mvQWbnrDXoEE9AwMYX+APZASeXUGt RvlOGcjR0E3sKMJpG801X6OmkauqnAigd4lLbU/O4qJ7kxs0tavh0QtYpS8f4pQNV/15hZpv4GG0G 2QLEvBiWIK7DiDoNl62Jpw==; In-Reply-To: (message from Quang Kien Nguyen on Fri, 23 Aug 2024 07:54:46 -0700) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:323093 Archived-At: > From: Quang Kien Nguyen > Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 07:54:46 -0700 > Cc: Pip Cet , sebastian@sebasmonia.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, > yantar92@posteo.net > > > How hard is it for Microsoft Windows users to navigate up to #10 and > > print the value of (struct Lisp_Process *)p? Do those gdb commands > > "just work" in gdb.exe? > > I think the gdb commands should work in Windows as normal. However > after attaching to Emacs, it becomes unbearably slow to type any > commands there. Each keystroke takes around 1s to type and it slows > down the whole Windows instead of just Emacs. Is that a known issue > and is there a work-around for that. Yes: the workaround is to start Emacs from GDB. When you do that, Emacs does not install a low-level keyboard hook that it normally does, and which is the reason for the slow responses to keys if you attach GDB to Emacs after it already started.