From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MPS: Forwording symbols Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 21:22:42 +0300 Message-ID: <86msnip0ul.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87jziod6yc.fsf@gmail.com> <874j9rcuf6.fsf@gmail.com> <87y173bda9.fsf@gmail.com> <87plsfbcd5.fsf@gmail.com> <86cyoeqvfc.fsf@gnu.org> <87frta9pgf.fsf@gmail.com> <86v826p346.fsf@gnu.org> <86r0cup24x.fsf@gnu.org> <874j9q9l37.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23357"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Helmut Eller Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 18 20:23:10 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sJdU6-0005sm-Iq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 20:23:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJdTj-0003q1-16; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 14:22:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJdTg-0003pS-Dh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 14:22:44 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJdTg-0005wG-56; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 14:22:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=S6EzqP/MOzEuX/7z2Snke0GegCjJZqp+k7BwOUsYwfE=; b=E/lVoA7NZYEQ 7OQig6/G+MWLwXSLxe5m7P2WNptWbD2oonelx2Iz3cj/DFGk0rxoscTJbLle5NtZPHdSyT1slF4NW slWg2vawAUWE2h/RXB/50QLEP2QE5nqcIGbO+e37i7gpZe979bN4Xc/xznLSEFZwNkSdUDgprCPS6 2I6mHMjWrx5nBQKQf03YE282Q0R7P/vCpEtbmAooYqTU2Uwej8Jj89Vy7kCaGieUvaGvMWrLY12G+ b/So1Ti6AmKiSf+awSnX5pE4UillRO3MmwiaJ4tTwu2isB9VxaCRWpN2XPPSs/nRmXoaqWmTNKVRw PbYlUwhBIbEum9QvIStFGQ==; In-Reply-To: <874j9q9l37.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Helmut Eller on Tue, 18 Jun 2024 20:12:12 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:320258 Archived-At: > From: Helmut Eller > Cc: gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 20:12:12 +0200 > > On Tue, Jun 18 2024, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > It means that VirtualProtect failed. Since 'mode' is zero, it means > > the function was called to remove protection from the mmemory block, > > and it failed, probably because the specified memory region was out of > > the program's address space? > > Could this be our old friend dump_discard_mem that is too lazy to check > error codes? What happens if you remove the call to > dump_mmap_discard_contents in pdumper_load? Then the build succeeds.