From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Damien Elmes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: last character on line different when behind invis text? Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 01:25:55 +1000 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <86lm69kgsc.fsf@mobile.repose.cx> References: <86bs7scq7v.fsf@mobile.repose.cx> <200208260036.g7Q0aO912379@wijiji.santafe.edu> <87ofbq5hke.fsf@free.net.ph> <86k7meb2jq.fsf@mobile.repose.cx> <86admvdt1d.fsf@mobile.repose.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1031671720 17165 127.0.0.1 (10 Sep 2002 15:28:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:28:40 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17omwQ-0004Sh-00 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 17:28:38 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17onWu-0006Hn-00 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 18:06:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17omvv-0002CF-00; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:28:07 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17omu1-00022L-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:26:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17omty-00020j-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:26:08 -0400 Original-Received: from cpe-203-51-32-241.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([203.51.32.241] helo=repose.cx) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17omty-0001yv-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:26:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mobile (respite.repose.cx [192.168.1.128]) by repose.cx (Postfix) with SMTP id 03A5E8647 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 01:34:23 +1000 (EST) Original-Received: by mobile (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 11 Sep 2002 01:25:55 +1000 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 06:29:08 -0400") Original-Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:7805 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:7805 Richard Stallman writes: > Please try this replacement function. The code does what the doc strings > says. Whether that makes for correct behavior I am not sure. This fixes the problem I mentioned! I had a look through the CVS logs for forward-visible-line, but I couldn't see any change which may have caused this behavior. The new behavior is certainly preferable - if there is any visible text on the line, it shouldn't be skipped over. Does anyone see a reason why this change shouldn't be commited? Regards, -- Damien Elmes