From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: andres.ramirez Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs rendering comparisson between emacs23 and emacs26.3 Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 22:15:49 +0000 Message-ID: <86lfnkf7my.fsf@gmail.com> References: <86tv2h2vww.fsf@gmail.com> <20200322123818.GB32470@ACM> <87eetk5swm.fsf@gnu.org> <20200326193128.GC14092@ACM> <86d08y4zsx.fsf@gmail.com> <83sghs7qdz.fsf@gnu.org> <7ee94ed4-7a11-90bd-df69-c0eeacaf191c@gmail.com> <835zeo7c92.fsf@gnu.org> <05de335b-383e-b32d-2e7e-e79192d364de@yandex.ru> <03981ead-3aca-c238-a9d0-88407ffae451@yandex.ru> <83wo745tw6.fsf@gnu.org> <86tv28faqh.fsf@gmail.com> <28ff7e4e-2072-23ce-6137-c74143c6d1f2@yandex.ru> <86r1xcf9d8.fsf@gmail.com> <85c08ac4-7f18-37bf-9f25-828832f352fd@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="101103"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , cpitclaudel@gmail.com, politza@hochschule-trier.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Cancel-Lock: sha1:jOi/lHI5oNxflOq1XFnwGvOcock= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 28 23:16:38 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jIJks-000QE5-2j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 23:16:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60396 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jIJkr-00070H-2R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 18:16:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35637) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jIJkF-0006ZU-7j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 18:16:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jIJkE-0005Lp-Dv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 18:15:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qv1-f65.google.com ([209.85.219.65]:34463) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jIJkE-0005LW-Ac; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 18:15:58 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qv1-f65.google.com with SMTP id s18so2500789qvn.1; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 15:15:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :cancel-lock:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=JJDBr+9zQzv4X7bYgSAg+0K6GetRVoXVyEH7CnRsQf0=; b=ZpJWO0hhzMgkdRk/Keai+katcBWo+6QAoHmkN2OW7mj5rOQVPnBr2AE1dAL8djZEZl jp7WHMZ63mMtCv5DGfzx8oPi1Xru0dkJHHlpcx6b+u52fcJd8dyrIRl2tGjIdWqK45YX k8OKqprGXai1Rs716ArKXEwq2tJXmoW0a99IeysiOLCjDw31/sYoW8xA7qOYjgAaZ8L+ EwlTea8Ux1wt3LJINvkfTSfiFDL8SLDvESIw5tvCrPEcFMCEKeCVQq5hiuMsISRHzqMX CdVXkqPAchbsGl8VBNK7GJ+txOx9FaCwST195vwNrC8vAZEAbQ9d/2TPpnpc285fk+93 nnbw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1UX1EJClIexfiDo/d/PFCRCOdXssMhLfH5d8BN8TyzzPJASBVu qcP2L2BONQ59GvU25PJS3271gIL8 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvxL4xz8FJQR62OSv6OkfYBwFSPl/GsH8kCxC0Lo/cjJZGZGaMWlKjFkXK/K5LgZve32j5gYQ== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:a8d8:: with SMTP id h24mr5283319qvc.154.1585433757541; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 15:15:57 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from sacsa.n800.arm.processor.yandex.fm ([190.236.255.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n38sm7252434qtk.64.2020.03.28.15.15.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 28 Mar 2020 15:15:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <85c08ac4-7f18-37bf-9f25-828832f352fd@yandex.ru> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.219.65 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:245909 Archived-At: Hi Dmitry. Dmitry> don't think Dmitry> so. IIUC, the branch's goal was to improve the performance of Dmitry> overlays. Not text properties (which font-lock uses). >> >> What about font-lock changing its use of text properties to use in >> place overlays? Dmitry> Not sure I understand the question. Could you rephrase that? Now: font-lock uses text properties Posibility: font-lock uses overlays (dismiss text properties) the AA-tree could be usable on that Posibility? Best Regards