From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MPS: weak hash tables Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 15:45:12 +0300 Message-ID: <86le2kc693.fsf@gnu.org> References: <2syUQ04IbTWqDJjMfKSrtzWMWmFGq1GIOwSxv_r6BEyNDtk7ADADKjZk-90g9tSS9SKWppkiq6_zihUtsoE1spiopaOI6-v9inQrGxwMyCs=@protonmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6872"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: pipcet@protonmail.com, eller.helmut@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 02 14:46:01 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sOctV-0001Pz-2l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 14:46:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOct3-0008UF-NQ; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 08:45:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOcsl-0008Pi-L7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 08:45:18 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOcsl-0001J1-C5; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 08:45:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=/fzO2NU9T517o3Vx5S9b5VlosKbqZmPYuBnawjWbKiw=; b=Bqq9nDWJ14HDDgFEqKhv H1/uU5dbSELzbMjyvVxGXDFejiOaBCwJHr3u6RJmlErcsJdpZ4zA6/zsvyJ++Gbb9VCkKqNN/A5B/ hYAXxvB6qqSibvjWLX2IOBoxcmDN+8QIyQ+Pq8fVSdUjT0KfHV8MKuHQkcAfzjeHCPF7jALvDkDnE l71XiqUxytelenZOQ82uiORTV8kiP8qxORx/Z1aUyXIqjbrEb87ZAUXL5mbyhl9w/NopC5jZYW4Iz qAF4g9tmr/T8zSeEL18Hz+t6u9+g+0mnqdlqs8VkjK3/wpAILoiwp3uNZAJaBNjFdZmfB22hMvOCb Q8M8VW8G1lrxyA==; In-Reply-To: (message from Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= on Tue, 02 Jul 2024 08:55:11 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:321138 Archived-At: > From: Gerd Möllmann > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Helmut Eller , > Emacs Devel > Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 08:55:11 +0200 > > > On 64-bit systems. 32-bit systems are still broken, I'm afraid, and > > while my patch fixes the crash I've seen on i386 Debian, Eli's crash > > looked very different and may not be fixed by it. > > >From my POV, it's not a deal breaker if 32-bit systems don't work with > igc, They still have the old GC, and 32-bit systems are kind of obsolete > even Intel says and so on. I don't share that view. Supporting 32-bit builds in Emacs is a must for years to come, and that's non-negotiable.