From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Split man directory Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:10:42 +0200 Message-ID: <86ir6pbexp.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> References: <87fy1v36be.fsf@neutrino.caeruleus.net> <877in51myr.fsf@kfs-lx.testafd.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1188987658 12688 80.91.229.12 (5 Sep 2007 10:20:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 10:20:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: angeli@caeruleus.net, Eli Zaretskii , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 05 12:20:57 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ISs0C-0002Om-MI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:20:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ISs0B-0005Y8-22 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 06:20:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ISrqS-0001j6-PN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 06:10:48 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ISrqS-0001iJ-08 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 06:10:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ISrqQ-0001iD-M8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 06:10:47 -0400 Original-Received: from pc3.berlin.powerweb.de ([62.67.228.11]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ISrqQ-00083n-3J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 06:10:46 -0400 Original-Received: from quinscape.de (dslnet.212-29-44.ip210.dokom.de [212.29.44.210] (may be forged)) by pc3.berlin.powerweb.de (8.9.3p3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA07829 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 12:10:40 +0200 X-Delivered-To: Original-Received: (qmail 1723 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2007 10:10:42 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO lola.quinscape.zz) ([10.0.3.43]) (envelope-sender ) by ns.quinscape.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 5 Sep 2007 10:10:42 -0000 Original-Received: by lola.quinscape.zz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DC6338F2E2; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 12:10:42 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <877in51myr.fsf@kfs-lx.testafd.dk> (Kim F. Storm's message of "Wed\, 05 Sep 2007 11\:27\:24 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:77849 Archived-At: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > Richard Stallman writes: > >> Indeed. But instead of `man', why not use the GNU-standard `doc'? >> Thus, we will have >> >> doc/emacs >> doc/lispref >> doc/lispintro >> doc/contrib (for other manuals) >> > I would suggest doc/userman rather than doc/emacs, as all of the manuals > are about emacs one way or another. I find doc/emacs more appropriate since, after all, emacs.info is generated from the files in that directory. -- David Kastrup