From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Moreton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] support for accessing CPU/core count (processor-count) Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 22:14:18 +0100 Message-ID: <86ily34639.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87y270bazi.fsf@yahoo.com> <87sfx8b6ta.fsf@yahoo.com> <46728405-9441-4e3d-be5e-75e1bceaee70@gmail.com> <87h7doj7ku.fsf@gnus.org> <83v923pmtf.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37793"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (windows-nt) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:De+3WEwvtzjvdBOTPw4E+sA0o+0= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 11 23:17:21 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ma2fh-0009al-1H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 23:17:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38472 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ma2ff-0005j9-S7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 17:17:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41564) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ma2cx-0003ix-Ng for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 17:14:31 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:47790) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ma2cw-0002vq-67 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 17:14:31 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ma2ct-000623-2S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 23:14:27 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276751 Archived-At: On Mon 11 Oct 2021, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Stefan Monnier >> Cc: Campbell Barton , Po Lu , >> emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:12:22 -0400 >> >> > Note that Paul already pushed the gnulib nproc solution to emacs-28. >> >> Why emacs-28? >> This is purely a new feature, and I can't see any urgency that would >> justify bypassing the general rule to only push bug fixes to emacs-28. > > 100% agreement. Indeed. The followup changes in commit 1a1b206a8b33 result in `w32-get-nproc' being removed, so should there be an obsolete alias for this function ? Otherwise users will see it removed from emacs without any deprecation period. AndyM