From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Allow controlling the effect of visibility on buffer switching Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 19:09:23 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86ilu59s7o.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <87a6fi3lrl.fsf@gmail.com> <83a6fihbeb.fsf@gnu.org> <877dam38zr.fsf@gmail.com> <8335lah77y.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29771"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: Thuna , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 27 18:44:04 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nD8oW-0007ce-K1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 18:44:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53542 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nD8oV-0000Fg-NM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 12:44:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44036) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nD8Vj-0008FU-0A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 12:24:39 -0500 Original-Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.231]:51849) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nD8Vg-00060I-Rj; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 12:24:38 -0500 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 019C4100008; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 17:24:30 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <8335lah77y.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 26 Jan 2022 17:01:05 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.178.231; envelope-from=juri@linkov.net; helo=relay11.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:285498 Archived-At: > So I'm asking whether "C-x b M-n RET" is not a good enough solution > for this use case? Does anyone else have an opinion? I agree that "C-x b M-n RET" is a good enough solution. Then the list for M-n could be sorted by recency of visiting buffers.