From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Split man directory Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 14:25:58 +0200 Message-ID: <86hcmafwh5.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> References: <87fy1v36be.fsf@neutrino.caeruleus.net> <85bqcjmo4m.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1188908785 3232 80.91.229.12 (4 Sep 2007 12:26:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 12:26:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Leo , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 04 14:26:21 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ISXTz-000861-Pu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 14:26:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ISXTt-0000Rw-QV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 08:26:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ISXTp-0000Re-WD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 08:26:06 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ISXTp-0000RN-HQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 08:26:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ISXTp-0000RJ-Bq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 08:26:05 -0400 Original-Received: from pc3.berlin.powerweb.de ([62.67.228.11]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ISXTo-0002vq-QA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 08:26:05 -0400 Original-Received: from quinscape.de (dslnet.212-29-44.ip210.dokom.de [212.29.44.210] (may be forged)) by pc3.berlin.powerweb.de (8.9.3p3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA25918 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:25:54 +0200 X-Delivered-To: Original-Received: (qmail 28778 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2007 12:25:58 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO lola.quinscape.zz) ([10.0.3.43]) (envelope-sender ) by ns.quinscape.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 4 Sep 2007 12:25:58 -0000 Original-Received: by lola.quinscape.zz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 09CA38FA3C; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:25:58 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue\, 04 Sep 2007 08\:17\:50 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:77741 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> I'd use "other" or "misc" rather than "contrib": after all, the >> manuals are all (c) FSF and part of Emacs proper. > > Why not "packages"? Because they aren't organized as packages at all? -- David Kastrup