From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Brinkhoff Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] scratch/record 25aa500 5/5: Backward compatibility with pre-existing struct instances. Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 19:18:17 +0200 Organization: nocrew Message-ID: <86h92cgfxi.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> References: <20170328192614.13038.29393@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20170328192617.32EF32017F@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <86y3voh8wf.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1490807936 22368 195.159.176.226 (29 Mar 2017 17:18:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:18:56 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 29 19:18:49 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctHF2-0004Lv-UX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 19:18:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60146 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctHF8-0004Zh-UH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:18:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58565) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctHEz-0004Xb-0h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:18:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctHEu-0004yq-VZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:18:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=58153 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctHEu-0004yd-P6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:18:32 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctHEi-0002Rf-En for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 19:18:20 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:5BVfeQAaMDz211uZtSBqOjrxpEQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:213509 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> As far as I can see, the struct isn't used directly. These >> definitions are derived from it: eieio--object-class-tag, and >> eieio--object-num-slot. The first just aref slot 0, and the second >> is 1. > > That's right. I put a FIXME because this inconsistency is ugly. > I'm not completely sure how best to fix it, tho. Maybe just define > those two accessors by hand. I did that now.