From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : Re: Completions and history Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 20:58:50 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86h76wx3ts.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <20220411112901.kv3lsyvx6yxwjbph.ref@Ergus> <20220411112901.kv3lsyvx6yxwjbph@Ergus> <86sfqjzhgl.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <20220411174031.2yuh2je5fl3lej7i@Ergus> <87ilre5i5a.fsf@gmail.com> <86k0burxd4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <865yndxvzt.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87ee215h1j.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10025"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: Daniel Mendler , Ergus , Augusto Stoffel , "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 13 20:19:40 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nehad-0002Sr-Tt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 20:19:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49224 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nehac-0004wE-Nz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:19:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53522) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nehJQ-0007xk-Ms for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:01:52 -0400 Original-Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:dc4:8::223]:43075) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nehJP-0000i0-0o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:01:52 -0400 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5146E60002; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 18:01:45 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Wed, 13 Apr 2022 16:40:48 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:4b98:dc4:8::223; envelope-from=juri@linkov.net; helo=relay3-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:288370 Archived-At: >> > Maybe the same key `C-c C-l' could be bound by default >> > in the minibuffer to enable history completion? >> >> Discussing default keybindings tends to be rather >> unfruitful, but still: unless I'm missing something, >> `M-r' (previous-matching-history-element) >> is strictly less powerful than `C-M-r' >> (isearch-backward-regexp). > > Dunno why you would choose to compare those two. Maybe history completion could be bound to 'C-c TAB' like in Icicles.