From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: tree-sitter crashes Emacs Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 16:50:09 +0300 Message-ID: <86h6fltx4e.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86wmokcp3c.fsf@p200300d6272f170fb9ce529a1eae86f3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de> <8634r8yy2j.fsf@gnu.org> <86bk5t64c7.fsf@p200300d6272f175ddfd595f93ae8ed6c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35323"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Joost Kremers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 28 15:51:17 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1s14w1-0008y7-1F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 15:51:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s14vD-0003pt-6Q; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 09:50:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s14v7-0003nV-Qf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 09:50:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s14v5-0006dB-7T; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 09:50:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=M4DhnZKWZO/g+hTg1dW1oPHUyahF2pk7Kqjsh6juOIY=; b=E28EH8zqfRt/ gBm5DiIY3aONENRCM6PldrjZ4k3ZiX7gZz89lgbINTyosCfSweYT/In1CftYZIlIkbcORl4XgwjLL Z2Qwf3wger3dd+JDLt0rAxoz4LVtW+5yScnfOEMv0etlLBiqwc0y55RCynMB8A62DtVBYTLsxpNV5 U+GeJHNoAZp/DRs1fawIFIpKRuDXSfn8nlk+R0J0JF9a1WZLKa0rJk8zFglc8rKnRELQHcGt65vHL xOWYTZKRG2yk+Cw6mam4TYnEexnvXFS22fi3T3YwkUco6qRc9a2DET2o+LISYRonC/TpxqXmP7j+7 MtYF4XBPDxvHcuyc0ht23w==; In-Reply-To: <86bk5t64c7.fsf@p200300d6272f175ddfd595f93ae8ed6c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de> (message from Joost Kremers on Sun, 28 Apr 2024 14:48:08 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:318285 Archived-At: > From: Joost Kremers > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 14:48:08 +0200 > > > The tree-sitter > > developers changed the ABI without bumping up the ABI version. > > Moreover, they think that's perfectly okay, since tree-sitter is > > "still in version 0.x". Because they didn't bump the ABI version, > > Linux distros didn't bother to update Emacs they distribute, and the > > result is crashes. > > >From what I understand reading the Github issue, it seems that the tree-sitter > devs are slowly starting to understand that this is not a good idea. I do hope that they will come around. Because it's _definitely_ not a good idea, for such a popular library.