From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master c86995d07e9: Enable code block evaluation when generating .org manuals Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2024 21:27:22 +0300 Message-ID: <86h6e29dkl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <171767737644.19678.784876979840850798@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20240606123616.DE7C9C1F9EF@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87h6e6i1mg.fsf@gmail.com> <87y17e0yug.fsf@localhost> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12075"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, kyle@kyleam.com To: Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 09 20:27:55 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sGNGk-0002vW-KE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2024 20:27:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sGNGR-0006BU-E8; Sun, 09 Jun 2024 14:27:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sGNGP-0006Ax-N3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2024 14:27:33 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sGNGP-00004q-AY; Sun, 09 Jun 2024 14:27:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=Xafjq7UFCO2KorJNob7nnaXcrc/9CONe2NqVAN2Zi2M=; b=bFauUYSahFc4 EEt9UK0y4W+FzZiEfsrALDAf2c0u238I/HU2Sp19MhcTDaKldnlnvgleY5p5coeTzDAcZ5OefHUaw 1Z0KAdkIh3wbQyDxm+Bn7vhfX92NHzYIc2XWTKUd93f2wZ4hS/ufp8NiRtEn5GxZiSZdN9Qfqpy3A gjKra92uskL/3DrMcQ+NoT143HXnRgFgxNUqQDZ+xRNPvx9XXH6m/k1/JnUjXTZidtF53+9ftSQDR ZksXzL7iza8jcg/qOFqolDuy0YYoVwdUXTj1d7HYgBtmSl0fN9D060txNT5dYDwITsiy6d7o4FIc5 L19tgJXjnnYDiWLQtS8saA==; In-Reply-To: <87y17e0yug.fsf@localhost> (message from Ihor Radchenko on Sun, 09 Jun 2024 18:12:39 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:319935 Archived-At: > From: Ihor Radchenko > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Kyle Meyer > Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2024 18:12:39 +0000 > > To Eli, > > AFAIU, emacs-30 branch will be cut next week. This discussion is what > is holding us from merging the released Org 9.7 , which we would like to > see in Emacs 30. > > Should we wait until this discussion settles before we merge? >From where I stand, you can merge it ASAP. In fact, I'd like to urge you to merge sooner rather than later, since this is one of the changes for which I'm waiting before branching. Thanks.