From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Improving EQ Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 08:36:55 +0200 Message-ID: <86frmt1k6w.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h679kftn.fsf@protonmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24541"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Pip Cet , Mattias =?utf-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= , Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 12 07:38:23 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tLcq7-0006EH-Lx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2024 07:38:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tLcp9-0005VY-Gc; Thu, 12 Dec 2024 01:37:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tLcp5-0005VE-Lr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2024 01:37:19 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tLcp3-0003DZ-2h; Thu, 12 Dec 2024 01:37:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=8kWSFJ1JZke9IFwaQ1j+9uKMrNKITRfupGOR/MMN4f4=; b=Y6m+NZPhBe60THxFzVGz d0rsB6yacI6Bo7h8RGbc6/qqVRvIuVNi9GACHymzfR8pir1tZHNwuRXiChFEnonqtmjBBhuNMQspG 6CkapKZMsabBm7FmyaIhS+q0SbuD3tJmLtNcY6ISxlH9zOBu/ZiPww0/qXRJE44E8eZtarMQXLhI0 BALflXrWl7YLrDQUQj11SeCEdBg01mIvWVMun2a8o+TnaC9nhVecXkENJRec1kgwgtGvoP8clm6ix HzBTCh7gNYOxpCq57Vl14IaqBXdFzye6kQill3CnWgRCk0XUph8wXvUZGyadfd+/EXBrsWgNbXjPN tSzkP2wUxzFnYg==; In-Reply-To: <87h679kftn.fsf@protonmail.com> (emacs-devel@gnu.org) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:326406 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 22:37:04 +0000 > From: Pip Cet via "Emacs development discussions." > > What's missing here is a benchmark, but unless there's a really nasty > surprise when that happens, I'm quite confident that we can improve the > code here. The usual easy benchmark is to byte-compile all the *.el files in the source tree. That is, remove all the *.elc files, then say "make" and time that. There was also some Emacs benchmark suite that someone posted, but I cannot find it now, maybe someone else will. Adding Mattias and Paul to this discussion.