From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-30 8064b2a6798: Document undocumented completion commands Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2025 14:11:47 +0200 Message-ID: <86frlx8np8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <173506838079.2264184.7348874799811402829@vcs3.savannah.gnu.org> <20241224192621.31046CA6ED0@vcs3.savannah.gnu.org> <86zfk58vv2.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15619"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eshel Yaron Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 05 13:37:00 2025 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tUPsK-0003vV-2F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2025 13:37:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tUPTz-0000qr-Mm; Sun, 05 Jan 2025 07:11:51 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tUPTy-0000qc-Dp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2025 07:11:50 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tUPTy-0008Ey-3H; Sun, 05 Jan 2025 07:11:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=fqliXU67m/EocpUgOFFuOFYSb7pu9GxD6z4bRYKZ0PM=; b=PGYmx73pzaci 1TVTdeol8627ufdkDcL3JKcinBQBhFPJhVizeCP0uAaejgQR+wmXTT8FieRSrX8Qe9j7cqAVd61zk 6B1mH5gHk+rqjiJ8+pD5pKrS6af5PEQMePdq13cgSK13dC46GBnxxjBt05U9xCTHvPIHf6LYquaoy lilD8Gn7pLmEHYDFc6BH2jbVJgSc8vTsRbCC+C4at4Apel7tJUc2eagfbkeae9svaK1WBUOm8E5lJ 60ambOlqKiPvTR7UUjO+ZgGt0hHm+2K7K19r3twCr+qR/yVJsgyzlFXhUkY6OEw2JHDLJgg0nwy6h +iBrawzmPw02FQ6BjNGGBA==; In-Reply-To: (message from Eshel Yaron on Sun, 05 Jan 2025 12:36:27 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:327719 Archived-At: > From: Eshel Yaron > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2025 12:36:27 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> From: Eshel Yaron > >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii > >> Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2025 09:06:04 +0100 > >> > >> > diff --git a/src/minibuf.c b/src/minibuf.c > >> > index f16880011f7..83b1fa024f8 100644 > >> > --- a/src/minibuf.c > >> > +++ b/src/minibuf.c > >> > @@ -1293,6 +1293,11 @@ barf_if_interaction_inhibited (void) > >> > DEFUN ("read-from-minibuffer", Fread_from_minibuffer, > >> > Sread_from_minibuffer, 1, 7, 0, > >> > doc: /* Read a string from the minibuffer, prompting with string PROMPT. > >> > +While in the minibuffer, you can use \\\\[minibuffer-complete] and \\[minibuffer-complete-word] to complete your input. > >> > +You can also use \\\\[minibuffer-complete-history] to complete using history items in the > >> > +input history HIST, and you can use \\[minibuffer-complete-defaults] to complete using > >> > +the default items in DEFAULT-VALUE. > >> > + > >> > The optional second arg INITIAL-CONTENTS is an obsolete alternative to > >> > DEFAULT-VALUE. It normally should be nil in new code, except when > >> > HIST is a cons. It is discussed in more detail below. > >> > >> This part isn't quite right: read-from-minibuffer does not provide > >> completion with minibuffer-complete[-word] by default. > >> > >> How about just dropping these references? > > > > Sorry, I don't want to drop them, they are important. > > > > Why do you say these are not supported by default? I can use them in > > "emacs -Q", so what did I miss? > > Hmm, C-h f read-from-minibuffer now says "While in the minibuffer, you can > use TAB and SPC to complete your input." But read-from-minibuffer doesn't > provide such completion, by default it uses minibuffer-local-map, in which > both keys are self-inserting. Do you see something different? Please help me make this accurate without losing the important information about these commands. Okay?