From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Task Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [NonGNU Elpa] New package: ETT Date: Wed, 03 May 2023 12:29:05 -0300 Message-ID: <86ednxbf70.fsf@disroot.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7401"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Yuri Khan Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 03 17:50:47 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1puEkh-0001hX-5e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 May 2023 17:50:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1puEjt-0005XY-Ed; Wed, 03 May 2023 11:49:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1puEVz-0006h0-UR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 May 2023 11:35:36 -0400 Original-Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1puEVx-0003Uc-Sx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 May 2023 11:35:35 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84AF640190; Wed, 3 May 2023 17:35:31 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Original-Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 72SZDNc7jibO; Wed, 3 May 2023 17:35:30 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1683128130; bh=xtfRJBUn7avtm6Vrax/RElTOlPRDfumSrV71sVHXXT0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Date; b=L0gUeRyK4Xn8vYOZ1vTJvnpXxgcSFpXqft04mdyh3hzzAIZX/xt8mHLwpT4GtIqpK zGzxhF7COfegegA7TpZw7WhltCkTuUTzhTv3HTxt8EGGMhvk8RnV1NbBEBKeCVA3Wp ARNyNOmjb7/qdCihlQv5uen3mGT/y54jazUa9zgouXG18GkE58ZBGjhnLIXVNDwGLq s9ljn/SwToYZCBi8wMkzcjBy009YOu6UDz/xiFueuiXPiqPnQ6UPT17gfJWeqv79g4 peoUM1cdV6zHagZ+lZe/DZV3nx5klspEm2P30n13QVPiUgpllP9jO8W9B1lNW/Plaq Z2rqQRas/8WLg== In-Reply-To: CAP_d_8VaYSE-NWgrR9mp_+Yn1Y3nFGzcVACzfGg6f1GFCDTQqQ@mail.gmail.com Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.21.23.139; envelope-from=q01@disroot.org; helo=knopi.disroot.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 03 May 2023 11:49:55 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:305780 Archived-At: Yuri Khan writes: > It looks here this part of code tries to normalize a partial date to > the DD-MM-YY format. Indeed, that's what it does. > Didn=E2=80=99t Y2K teach us anything, also, shouldn=E2=80=99t > YYYY-MM-DD be used instead? I don't plan to live that much :) As for the format, I think what goes first and what goes last is a personal preference. I'd like to offer an option to change that, but so many parts of the code are tied to this format right now that a major refactor would be needed. It sounds fun though, so maybe I'll do it some day. Best regards.