From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Question about bignum usage Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 10:36:06 +0300 Message-ID: <86ed8snk0p.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86frt8nn8b.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2403"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 20 09:36:57 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sKCLo-0000NE-PK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 09:36:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sKCL6-0002d7-IZ; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 03:36:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sKCL4-0002cP-Km for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 03:36:10 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sKCL4-0004ki-Ck; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 03:36:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=FDCeRrTU37zvLkw9ziADlaLTmf7bS/mQ2Nt9fEZ+u5U=; b=lCkkREAh0OVj3+3isMD2 F+Bkb3tksgr+9/2gGF7YW4GNeex7CGLjYASv8sAAKACrrXRwTpfNwZIgltTdGCYVcVaTDT1rpUeKo pYUAW5YIT5NWzCs/q/8uFJaYospp5ugeYtWSCoCGqVZ9LgOr00Onz4NP8G+t3HjK79UMBpEjyuyjL hKp4bvNsONVSQv7KTQViC8algDtvN327QGEwR9UuGfJxJgsPb8FWKbkikvjGMqglY3Wo8wbNl6zv3 fjYMbb53IbbyIxtqBGpvGd+TyKT0qCb7ER+wnSp5NPFEMqrmTuWSjna66nSFc/9a0UV5ozJp8mZFG l1Cik1u3LcR5BA==; In-Reply-To: (message from Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= on Thu, 20 Jun 2024 08:34:22 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:320313 Archived-At: > From: Gerd Möllmann > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 08:34:22 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Why not? Time values are known to produce bignums, yes. > > Ok. > > > What does list-timers show on that system? > > 1.0s 5.0s auto-revert-buffers > 5.4s - undo-auto--boundary-timer > 4m 19.0s 5m persistent-scratch-save > * 0.1s t show-paren-function > * 0.5s t posframe-hidehandler-daemon-function > * 0.5s t #f(compiled-function () # [jit-lock--antiblink-grace-timer jit-lock-context-fontify]) > * 0.5s :repeat blink-cursor-start > * 1.0s t which-key--update This means we check for expired times every 100 msec, so yes, we will create a lot of bignums. I see something similar here as well.