From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: master 8aef5d224a6: Merge branch 'scratch/tty-child-frames'
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 09:47:02 +0200
Message-ID: <86ed22kd8p.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <173459970775.288909.12887171645975658795@vcs3.savannah.gnu.org>
 <20241219091511.B84DEC022CC@vcs3.savannah.gnu.org>
 <87ikrflx8s.fsf@gmx.de> <m2ikrf7uj3.fsf@gmail.com>
 <868qsblu13.fsf@gnu.org> <m21py37quf.fsf@gmail.com>
 <865xnfls2x.fsf@gnu.org> <m2a5cq51jz.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="5841"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: michael.albinus@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 20 08:47:39 2024
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1tOXjW-0001NB-9A
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 08:47:38 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1tOXj1-00045y-TL; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 02:47:07 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1tOXj0-000440-3A
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 02:47:06 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1tOXiz-0006Yj-Qd; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 02:47:05 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:
 Date; bh=tdj7R2Hxz4/NQtWP8GStTbINl3xD+GIMe2QxTE/mb7Q=; b=rYREvsGE5G4udMFfBoUQ
 M/bQ4mf6Ev7owbGQ5aq4rHcugUbY/BaxJOLykxmJehQ5Xi3GJL0wJapRNNi10Ei8NXjpOJ3isIi00
 MLzkhG2bBS/k/bCUYceVMcsqOvTTt/9vDr3KMCb8hRSIblISBYzCjd5hIGd+GJy/NRt3hPmUsyXlD
 iXWQ7p8lp8Y+ZOvxLHmczEQsA5YESc9weR8dYukSgSXsGnBZ0jEKL133gs9jhW7IwfmGfitvG8oGd
 c2iPzgMhxvRjXGEkgSrxli+wwJ4SicQuH3F+/Ij4k/hfjF72ODPMX+c0u7tFx6ne/p6eZZDMF13DH
 z6doJZfJywmooQ==;
In-Reply-To: <m2a5cq51jz.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M?=
 =?utf-8?Q?=C3=B6llmann?= on Fri, 20 Dec 2024 07:08:32 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:326782
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/326782>

> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
> Cc: michael.albinus@gmx.de,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 07:08:32 +0100
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> I could maybe make check_tty not signal if noninteractive == true. I
> >> guess that could make things work, one has to try, but it surely doesn't
> >> win a beauty price :-(.
> >
> > If it makes a test work, why not?  We can even document this in a
> > comment.
> 
> The test now succeeds for me, but I'm feeling a little bit dirty :-).

Welcome to the club.