From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Make Signal handling patch platform-dependent? Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 17:11:41 +0200 Message-ID: <86ed1y4eoi.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o713wwsi.fsf@telefonica.net> <87ldw7fwet.fsf@protonmail.com> <87a5cnfj8t.fsf@protonmail.com> <87ttaueqp9.fsf@protonmail.com> <87ldw6ejkv.fsf@protonmail.com> <87v7vacvbe.fsf@protonmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33522"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: pipcet@protonmail.com, ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org, eller.helmut@gmail.com, acorallo@gnu.org To: Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 23 16:12:17 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tPk6T-0008VO-6O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:12:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tPk62-0006ew-Qt; Mon, 23 Dec 2024 10:11:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tPk60-0006em-H9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2024 10:11:48 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tPk5z-0004Pb-20; Mon, 23 Dec 2024 10:11:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=rOu4qGbI1FotiXrrtr61FW0uHTdzibhPhQ07e9j6ErM=; b=o8XQkB1x2GPcXOrgj2Tc 9q8e63GclTbJ7IrHk0dvms4i7bdY1T4v1egqxGsl4kolrf4SX9YN8nAx/MT1zLL/q0t3X7UMLCYHw 5RDMn72y45Ew7+aAGk7pyvCC091U3cHiHYmm45VkkeEr54OuujhY6vJdReV3m+3P/nYh+iusyfK1A Sh8IzLnobNT++wPmgCHLViZjXYpMdmN6dLKxtDmBjTDUNaAX5aQt641MAMDmy6E0Lh/rBCdrDh7cH Y7gbYIIuG0eqjH59ejnFKzncfsRfjdcUn+eECrDOiaxIcvVhtpG0xLJY9PXGYdESKsVf2Lqme5wSV NacLZJK2W+r3Qg==; In-Reply-To: (message from Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=B6llmann?= on Mon, 23 Dec 2024 15:54:36 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:326912 Archived-At: > From: Gerd Möllmann > Cc: Óscar Fuentes , emacs-devel@gnu.org, > Helmut Eller , Andrea Corallo > Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 15:54:36 +0100 > > Pip Cet writes: > > > If we come up with a solution to the signal issue which works but > > requires the creation of extra threads, would that prevent the merge? > > I think that's for Eli to answer. I don't see why extra threads would be a problem, as long as they don't use the Lisp machine or any parts of the global state. We already have several threads on MS-Windows, including for emulating Posix signals, so I don't see why adding C threads on Posix systems would be "verboten".