From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Some ideas with Emacs Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 05:17:07 +0100 Message-ID: <86d0d7mke4.fsf@zoho.eu> References: <837e3iq0ks.fsf@gnu.org> <87h82my0fm.fsf@gmx.de> <4f3fe5b0-3a63-346e-5cea-bb5ed057e028@gmail.com> <83o8wtond2.fsf@gnu.org> <87sgm3akzz.fsf@md5i.com> <83a78bn561.fsf@gnu.org> <86k17fpw3s.fsf@zoho.eu> <837e3fmmfx.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Emanuel Berg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="193443"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 02 05:17:32 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ibd9N-000o8N-DM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 05:17:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58708 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ibd9M-0007c7-6K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 23:17:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44852) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ibd9E-0007bk-Bm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 23:17:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ibd9C-0002fS-DE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 23:17:20 -0500 Original-Received: from 195-159-176-226.customer.powertech.no ([195.159.176.226]:37124 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ibd9C-0002cY-6b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 23:17:18 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ibd98-000nuc-D1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 05:17:14 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:yJYcHvgBF1K82Y5UrVwt1i4EVAk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242987 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> If there is a button, one would immediately >> see, "oh, there's more". > > Doesn't "C-h S" give you the same feedback? A button is a faster, more intuitive and more exact interface IMO but in terms of feedback the way I envision it that'd be identical to `C-h S', yes. -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 https://dataswamp.org/~incal