From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Missing entries for Perl in etags-regen-file-extensions -- okay for emacs-30? Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 08:19:38 +0300 Message-ID: <86cykw2rkl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y13mznw9.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> <86h6aa7gw1.fsf@gnu.org> <87ploya1hc.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> <867cb67888.fsf@gnu.org> <10dd3554-4249-41d1-864d-30cab687da6a@gutov.dev> <86o74i5edp.fsf@gnu.org> <690fff1d-b8f2-4e6e-b105-21ca97a0a92e@gutov.dev> <86ldzl5vzj.fsf@gnu.org> <3b153949-c990-49c9-9618-28850d3ee57c@gutov.dev> <86sett2g43.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6364"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: spwhitton@spwhitton.name, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 22 07:20:07 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ssF0w-0001WQ-00 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2024 07:20:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ssF0Y-0000fy-53; Sun, 22 Sep 2024 01:19:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ssF0X-0000fh-86 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2024 01:19:41 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ssF0W-0003Nv-Sj; Sun, 22 Sep 2024 01:19:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=z37HyBAUbo0aGsaBEeBBMeXQ+3ciP78wLjeM8J3SXv0=; b=Hh1m9tYU9HfR R0Rr8WepV8u8/VgiN5ehbktK7l5CXhe9qL2hkdGIfvv6P5UyfDIzK17nbs4BT4fCI0LBStwGplL/O 7wuG6L1N2zX+fIXuvLSUt/YmAWPALQK6ApgVnIYNbGkNxLMBCC+Yj/roc9T1LA/WbRdMjRIUbLr3K O9tM7tFBafzxSc+OnEL+rbkA2HA+QT85gaWVkX49cEEku/yguII6HVgwJlCfJ4bL6lWb+ywBYSml2 QCiPX2y5CtwN6By/gURKgyi0yFT/HzBoqdJAOr8oLI4pqgKotZPyhBQArU8cTJNf40hXzFxEZORL9 j2+TW55ATImi+0HEPUq7Mg==; In-Reply-To: (message from Dmitry Gutov on Sun, 22 Sep 2024 04:09:22 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:323913 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 04:09:22 +0300 > Cc: spwhitton@spwhitton.name, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > > On 21/09/2024 18:14, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > If you have reservations about some of the extensions, let's exclude > > them for now. I believe there are just a few of them, while the vast > > majority should present no problem, right? I'm okay with leaving out > > HTML and Texinfo. Are there more of those? TeX, perhaps? > > TeX yes. I'm also not sure about PostScript - but really because I still > don't know how a function definition in that language looks, even after > skimming through a manual. > > Speaking of other extensions, isn't ".a" usually a compiled library > rather than ASM source code? Also curious about ".t" for Scheme and > ".ml" for Lisp. Fine, let's exclude all of these. It still leaves quite a lot. > Not much else jumps out, but if somebody else has suggestions what to > remove, we should probably do so (for the release branch). Basically, > whatever extensions that might be not very common for a given language > and could create false hits. Agreed.