From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Some experience with the igc branch Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 15:15:45 +0200 Message-ID: <86cyhh2pdq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o713wwsi.fsf@telefonica.net> <86seqe4j4f.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttaucub8.fsf@protonmail.com> <87pllicrpi.fsf@protonmail.com> <864j2u442i.fsf@gnu.org> <87ldw6as5f.fsf@protonmail.com> <87bjx1bcp8.fsf@protonmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25331"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org, eller.helmut@gmail.com, acorallo@gnu.org To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 24 14:16:44 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tQ4mC-0006UA-Mn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2024 14:16:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tQ4lM-00043N-4Z; Tue, 24 Dec 2024 08:15:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tQ4lK-00042r-Hq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2024 08:15:50 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tQ4lJ-0004ln-Cx; Tue, 24 Dec 2024 08:15:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=pZfaG85EZhoJFXOZenyS78pIK8KdhsHi1jWERTvqWR8=; b=DR5hg7KqXLn3aADgQr6+ ZGf5DC1byuGnZpzMMI863QzOeEU3ChBMtOtFXZN54SlNE+z0f6s5bAus4UHS09fzGFle837WdvT5H vET5l2UjbfTt/AKh4WgXdU/c/U6VMnHZGui5WhEQJJeLLjW87fgB37FK+oZn40IZf37HkhMR6AUdb bSpjnxCh+sneYoVib1fFogO7Q/5RWol4hr5d5ozrnVS3clGxcEpvADAAuUt35Xn021uSEHzqIMMtn CevEufpMLRZvArfFJbMAGK6oqz7bbi5bHcLOC72GNYUFZbspi/wxdAlSsZc2+2Bay0HX0sJ2Z/Z4z U6bSA05dU3kxmg==; In-Reply-To: <87bjx1bcp8.fsf@protonmail.com> (message from Pip Cet on Tue, 24 Dec 2024 10:25:38 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:327006 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 10:25:38 +0000 > From: Pip Cet > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org, eller.helmut@gmail.com, acorallo@gnu.org > > Gerd Möllmann writes: > > > New day, new beliefs :-). Today, when I read my question again, I'd > > actually be surprised if a signal handler could allocate Lisp objects > > because I wouldn't be able to explain how that works with alloc.c which > > isn't reentrant. Not even Fcons is reentrant when I look at it now. > > > > Correct, or am I overlooking something? Could others please check? If > > it's right, things get a lot easier. > > I agree. But Eli said something about wanting to run Lisp from a signal > handler, which would change that. Not Lisp, but the Lisp machine in general. Which includes access to Lisp data to read and write it.