Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: improve "next locus from <buffer>" messages

[Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org>]

Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net> writes:

>>>> +---
>>>> +** next-error-suppress-locus-message controls when `next-error'
>>>> +   outputs a message about the error locus.
>>>
>>> Is this feature really expected to be used often to deserve the new
>>> defcustom or a simple defvar would be enough?
>>
>> If it's a defcustom, it is easier for people to find, if they are
>> bothered by the verbosity.
>>
>>> In any case I recommend to rename it to next-error-verbosity.
>>
>> ok.
>
> Sorry, I realized only after your commit that a better name would be
> next-error-verbose.  

Makes sense

> Also this makes clear that the meaning of its value should be reversed -
> to show verbose messages when the value is non-nil.  

Yes, I realized that when I went to set it.

> But I have no opinion about its default value, if you want you can
> change it from nil to t.

On the principle of least bother to others, I'll make the default be the
verbose setting.

Thanks for your help.

-- 
-- Stephe