From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; Bold screen fonts have been unbolded Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:07:38 +0200 Message-ID: <86abjvo2hh.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> References: <86ej97o43e.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <480477DD.4080702@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208254134 29389 80.91.229.12 (15 Apr 2008 10:08:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:08:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 15 12:09:30 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jli5W-0002ys-Rd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:08:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jli4s-0007DN-98 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:07:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jli4n-0007DF-QC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:07:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jli4l-0007Ca-ON for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:07:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jli4l-0007CR-GE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:07:43 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jli4l-0001JZ-45 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:07:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Jli4k-000885-TM for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:07:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jli4i-0001Id-He for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:07:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.quinscape.de ([212.29.44.217]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jli4i-0001I0-3j for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:07:40 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail-ldap/ctrl 4325 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2008 10:07:38 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO lola.quinscape.zz) ([10.0.3.43]) (envelope-sender ) by quinx.quinscape.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 15 Apr 2008 10:07:38 -0000 Original-Received: by lola.quinscape.zz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 729788F854; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:07:38 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <480477DD.4080702@gnu.org> (Jason Rumney's message of "Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:39:41 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir MailGate (version: 2.1.3-2; AVE: 7.8.0.6; VDF: 7.0.3.165; host: quinx) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95256 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:22028 Archived-At: Jason Rumney writes: > David Kastrup wrote: >> This is pretty weird: I don't replace my Emacs that often, so I am not >> sure when this started: some place in the last months. The effect I see >> is that bold (and strong-colored) fonts don't appear bold or >> strong-colored but with normal stroke width and somewhat dulled. >> > > Is this the first version you've installed that has had the new font > backend enabled? Possible. I am sorry that I have not tracked this more closely. > There appear to be various problems with italic and bold variations in > the new font backend. The momentary proper display while dragging the > window may be because of a bug where the old font code is called in > some circumstances. Interesting. -- David Kastrup