From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nic Ferrier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ELPA security Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 17:28:35 +0100 Message-ID: <86a9maryh8.fsf@ferrier.me.uk> References: <8738zf70ep.fsf@riseup.net> <871uejlbm1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k3rrr31g.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <874nium8h0.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87zk0ljaub.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wqvng299.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ip77y2s9.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87vc4yme4o.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1372436928 5570 80.91.229.3 (28 Jun 2013 16:28:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 16:28:48 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 28 18:28:49 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UsbXU-0000J9-KL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 18:28:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46468 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UsbXU-0001MM-8Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:28:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52446) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UsbXQ-0001Lr-50 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:28:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UsbXM-0007X2-PP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:28:44 -0400 Original-Received: from static.17.66.46.78.clients.your-server.de ([78.46.66.17]:44452 helo=po1.ferrier.me.uk) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UsbXM-0007WQ-JI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:28:40 -0400 Original-Received: from soundcloud (140.35.155.90.in-addr.arpa [90.155.35.140]) by po1.ferrier.me.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A17AC0063; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 18:30:08 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from soundcloud (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by soundcloud (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D10FE002DA; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 18:28:36 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87vc4yme4o.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:47:03 -0400") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 78.46.66.17 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:161244 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > SM> I think the list of signed/unsigned archives should be managed > SM> dynamically/automatically: if a signature is missing, ask the user if > SM> she thinks it's normal, and if so, place the archive into a list of > SM> "unsigned archives", so the question is not repeated. But every time we > SM> access the archive, we still try to get the a signature. If we do find > SM> a signature, then remove the archive from the "unsigned archives" list. > > I'd rather go with the `etc/elpa/A' scheme above. Can you please > consider it? FWIW I run marmalade-repo and I prefer Stefan's suggestion. Nic Ferrier