From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: master 9ccaa09a635: ; .dir-locals.el (log-edit-mode)
 <fill-column>: Set to 64.
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 22:30:40 +0200
Message-ID: <86a5oawvf3.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <170727415485.32408.11264518274307262467@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org>
 <20240207024915.38686C0EFEC@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org>
 <CADwFkmmK+r6Q_GdTa++PaZRm3ngQ_ueXR2yfzN8RaS607dUiOg@mail.gmail.com>
 <87plx74u0i.fsf@yahoo.com> <0e8b1009-1491-2fb7-9efc-c415ed66d334@gmail.com>
 <87a5ob4ok3.fsf@yahoo.com> <62ce63d3-76ce-b511-b2bf-27eb526bb711@gmail.com>
 <8634u3xvuq.fsf@gnu.org> <19ce18d6-3754-c755-2b1b-5fa15734b63c@gmail.com>
 <86cyt6wy7h.fsf@gnu.org> <40d7c1de-c1fa-6501-a021-4c78b51d5268@gmail.com>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="29664"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 08 21:32:04 2024
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1rYB3z-0007Re-O4
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 21:32:03 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1rYB3I-00053K-Jj; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 15:31:23 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1rYB3D-000532-3w
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 15:31:17 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1rYB3B-0006Fc-PT; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 15:31:14 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=/CrgPN0dsAohGB0oGRlfc8jaLyQ1B5FY6xbDv9Ns28A=; b=dmj3mKB4ex0A
 +jAYo2qzQrAtZ+M8pcrFFs9zn5BCb/eOWlN3It0zE6BocihUYnx4fokbdA3mg0RSzWuJogovUGYwV
 H1iTBdCs9OCB3vMqcEbKISRJw2Op0A0XBdxQ3hDVnnfOXQBol12CB9pAZMng76M3RC8+Z7d6Dt8As
 geEGt976235keFrR80eo7hYG+gXF/Ws/X5W9rcs4NgiLnoDnm3qqlNZJpzGQDIldvnYUKM8Q4I/75
 /y1MXgEL3x5yS8/l2TlT1FR1EPpFOCB//v7UatAlQJ03XK1BagT1wK2A82U15VW7LAtkemtPNO3ms
 Oz6C+jVkWTexa7Pk/d6C5A==;
In-Reply-To: <40d7c1de-c1fa-6501-a021-4c78b51d5268@gmail.com> (message from
 Jim Porter on Thu, 8 Feb 2024 12:21:37 -0800)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:316051
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/316051>

> Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 12:21:37 -0800
> Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@gmail.com>
> 
> >> This, and other bullet points are all talking in the context of a single
> >> commit. But this paragraph talks about multiple ChangeLog entries within
> >> one commit (*after* the summary line and descriptive paragraph). After
> >> carefully reading this, I think it means that one ChangeLog entry is a
> >> line of the form "* some/file.el (function): Frobnicate the widget."
> > 
> > Yes.  But where did you see any verbiage to the contrary?
> 
> The first sentence of the section begins, "Ordinarily, a change you 
> commit should contain a log entry in its commit message...". That is, 
> there's just one log entry in the commit message. Here, it mentions 
> multiple entries in a single commit.

So that single use of "entry" (not "ChangeLog entry", mind you) was
what confused you?  very well, now that single instance is gone as
well.

> In practice, I think this section of CONTRIBUTE is clear enough for 
> people to understand how to properly-format their commit messages, and 
> my main confusion was in whether to account for TAB characters in the 
> ChangeLog *files* when counting columns for wrapping.

The text talks about ChangeLog entries in a commit log message, and
explicitly says "unindented", so the answer is definitely NO.

Thanks.