From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Adding Flycheck to NonGNU ELPA Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 20:48:22 +0200 Message-ID: <86a5nwp9xl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <41bdb94a-3f9c-4b46-b061-b0c5e31a403e@app.fastmail.com> <871q98bb7q.fsf@posteo.net> <72490bec-175b-46b6-aaf9-153b3c242b70@app.fastmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1411"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: philipk@posteo.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Bozhidar Batsov" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 19 19:49:12 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rc8hU-00008u-2T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 19:49:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rc8gm-0006Yq-OK; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 13:48:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rc8gj-0006Yf-Ky for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 13:48:25 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rc8gj-0002by-2a; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 13:48:25 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=sMh2LAcuL2SJl8CH3C1z7fC9e617GtlRSFQJp0H9vuQ=; b=giinOe/gBCLI RMCIsNjqWMTGp7PgmdennzfC8Ba2/DaTuPtTYzlD60MJxWaXEj/JQWd5BQZ6fPt3UOZBO1dAh8Ox+ jbxqBI4f6OSjyKNC5ufXw8ttgGvxBLT2TRZfKxAK923TJhSc/rccsQEQ2jNoI/L95ENCz+SdUx0SH UnQK1DOTFSTaW4YzkuOYXM6XuMordADjZnR7r1ogFJRJttVkS765u0phXKeYsqWWEm0tpX63T6tAW ItIu9PGy/8TT6/dEthuWWPP8u/5XIGELmDLkUVm1mtknh2fYIlM7d9bOQupyg4DD94VlY+sbIoQPN spbtSyV8QeCBjfrGtx9XPQ==; In-Reply-To: <72490bec-175b-46b6-aaf9-153b3c242b70@app.fastmail.com> (bozhidar@batsov.dev) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:316362 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 20:08:15 +0200 > From: "Bozhidar Batsov" > Cc: "Emacs Devel" > > Btw, flymake-flycheck was created only because Joao wouldn't agree to provide Flycheck support in Eglot (I > know this from the author of flymake-flycheck). The whole situation with Elgot was a classic example of the > hostility in Emacs towards packages some maintainers dislike... > (https://github.com/joaotavora/eglot/issues/42) To set the record straight: that issue is from 2018, full 4 years before Eglot was added to Emacs. So I don't see how any incident from back then could be considered "a classic example of hostility in Emacs".