From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Question about =?utf-8?Q?=C3=BCarent-frame?= changes Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 09:40:47 +0300 Message-ID: <86a5fuc3yo.fsf@gnu.org> References: <9bc2af0a-d3c1-4ba6-a350-af6e2b85695d@gmx.at> <87y13phwbk.fsf@gmail.com> <8634lnda4y.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30079"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 26 08:41:04 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1stiBT-0007cF-Td for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 08:41:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1stiBH-0005rU-Hh; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 02:40:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1stiBF-0005r7-Q6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 02:40:49 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1stiBF-0006pF-H5; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 02:40:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=Y7g80+30mjeEB6fT5htSZlNSkxRB2Q1h4MMsVyvZyek=; b=SdkxT9cI7O241C19XeGn AIFBWpw2SztKZSLumKl5PQbpXy50LxQ+I8XU12H2KkR4KJfCnqKvJBc557TPPJMtNt8UQZCPx+ZWQ /cbOKa9JywfzlSxH3WnWG3xwf9uQPoH25BULqJbW4OkThbXgs4Ecmhk6fbO9Jn6hV7Q68D+rejU0E xeLd6MbzlSGEbSbXjw/A14wGrsfnDN7fYzYqzFruzrYljZemcUXdH5puepfQB+MEnGRNTx/MsTWqL eA198bOrmDuCr16tQJ+zu+BGj0MpMtJxJdGXdwrUX9LBOJbOSOcYLDVZa/2LqoeNhFrHl+S74lqzW wkfehVMor/skyg==; In-Reply-To: (message from Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= on Thu, 26 Sep 2024 07:01:16 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:324100 Archived-At: > From: Gerd Möllmann > Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 07:01:16 +0200 > > > Maybe I should add that I don't think this is a problem. It's more than > fast enough for me at least, with ca. 50ms for a make-frame + redisplay > + delete-frame. Yes, 50 ms is below the threshold for most of us. But the question is what happens on slower systems.