From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: MPS: dangling markers
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 21:11:38 +0300
Message-ID: <868qynipph.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87v81u85hv.fsf@localhost> <jwv1q4i3x9a.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <m234oxsny6.fsf@pro2.fritz.box> <87frsx81m2.fsf@localhost>
 <m2bk3l5811.fsf@pro2.fritz.box> <87cyo180y2.fsf@localhost>
 <m27ce957lz.fsf@pro2.fritz.box> <874j9d7zqe.fsf@localhost>
 <m25xts8kpq.fsf@pro2.fritz.box> <87sewvg6lw.fsf@localhost>
 <m2jzi7dchh.fsf@pro2.fritz.box> <86ed8fiug3.fsf@gnu.org>
 <m24j9b8ymo.fsf@pro2.fritz.box> <m2wmm77joe.fsf@pro2.fritz.box>
 <86bk3jirx7.fsf@gnu.org> <m2sewv7hku.fsf@pro2.fritz.box>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="33230"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: yantar92@posteo.net, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,
 emacs-devel@gnu.org, eller.helmut@gmail.com
To: Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 29 20:12:04 2024
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1sNcYM-0008Mp-5J
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2024 20:12:02 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1sNcY5-0005il-Ra; Sat, 29 Jun 2024 14:11:45 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1sNcY3-0005iO-WF
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2024 14:11:44 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1sNcY2-0005St-LF; Sat, 29 Jun 2024 14:11:43 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:
 Date; bh=43NweFPAcsJz3LECOl/hp/x8Dnx/8P5tZRMtotpqFX8=; b=kzgO94ulZGNWzGWXcmW2
 Zx6fNoaufZwGunBU0MoV4aE6yBKGAK/r6drrIoG7kMI/o8vc2j59hycIsZFCrxjUYSn43INjd8aCX
 m2YHbTEbU09x/+lWJ9tGv0JWQQlsRob9oyPclEzWLJu0nkg8I3PV9uXJffdUJBQz4x5vMJK68g00z
 hi5PmxlsjqQr9jsTBszyEJjhD3fvkMLU1OBsofmkO8C/G+p/aopU7iy2DHwXFW5pO8CxVZJ4k5ump
 b0ZJMAuBOTA+mcqJECBqx+0MscFVcSK1KWL3MuIaPtvXuJdgogqf7cR2wmUkPvKlJovlzKj2b0p91
 99x/2uxeqEi0HQ==;
In-Reply-To: <m2sewv7hku.fsf@pro2.fritz.box> (message from Gerd
 =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= on Sat, 29 Jun 2024 20:02:41 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:320877
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/320877>

> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
> Cc: yantar92@posteo.net,  monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,  emacs-devel@gnu.org,
>   eller.helmut@gmail.com
> Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 20:02:41 +0200
> 
> Sorry, I've asked not precisely enough. Do we know the percentage of
> markers generated by that code? I mean, of the 500K markers Ihor sees,
> how many could be spare?

I don't know, but a simple instrumentation (or even just a suitably
defined breakpoint) will tell.