From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: igc, macOS avoiding signals
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 21:15:47 +0200
Message-ID: <868qrxnfrw.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <799DDBC5-2C14-4476-B1E0-7BA2FE9E7901@toadstyle.org>
 <m2a5cdfxtf.fsf@gmail.com> <87h66loc17.fsf@gmail.com>
 <m21pxpfw2h.fsf@gmail.com> <878qrxoayj.fsf@gmail.com>
 <m2ttaleev9.fsf@gmail.com> <8734i5o6wc.fsf@gmail.com>
 <m2msgdeb9j.fsf@gmail.com> <87cyh9mpn5.fsf@gmail.com>
 <874j2l1hei.fsf@protonmail.com> <874j2lmd37.fsf@gmail.com>
 <m2v7v1mbmj.fsf@gmail.com> <87msgdkt29.fsf@gmail.com>
 <86h66lnjrt.fsf@gnu.org> <m2ikr1m2z1.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="1327"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: eller.helmut@gmail.com, pipcet@protonmail.com, spd@toadstyle.org,
 emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 30 20:16:42 2024
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1tSLFp-0000Cd-RZ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 20:16:41 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1tSLF6-00075p-CD; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 14:15:57 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1tSLF1-00075W-0v
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 14:15:53 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1tSLEz-0001Jg-PC; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 14:15:50 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:
 Date; bh=+X45bNdFwGdSN150467n1H6x4Ba/qqmcWHIrvClhpDQ=; b=kfUu8Z4n9w6/vwRpSDq9
 X6PYzWYFmJTwKbVEZg2MYW4lWtqdh5Cfamqv8CCWsmrIVNvSJ1KEKJyHZNhYkN+gekkmvbXhzmMuE
 TC68fNd/QP+0Zh8pPtHbSAuq5x3/Iqdj/UuhyNUZzF2fJtCiL5XV2ga7TjFnAQ+wHdl5Ooz0bpxYF
 pXmoO7E5n0wDJaHp5sdpds5zdcUlNG1Kr7bAqPFrD1YlrEDNrxQj7o+BtuetU9+nzRgbikv1Y/l0P
 383fUjPF7406O3EmleuO50pZSgkYGP2RhnUrZarjg/ghcinI1WMqMWFlPmxamcEUQx9NkzUvtgydk
 bscfmeI2JApaKA==;
In-Reply-To: <m2ikr1m2z1.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M?=
 =?utf-8?Q?=C3=B6llmann?= on Mon, 30 Dec 2024 19:37:38 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:327466
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/327466>

> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
> Cc: Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@gmail.com>,  pipcet@protonmail.com,
>   spd@toadstyle.org,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 19:37:38 +0100
> 
> So, to summarize, everyone agrees with Helmut? 

That the SIGPROF handler in the form he described would be safe?  I
agree.