From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: progmodes/project.el and search paths Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 09:27:39 -0500 Message-ID: <867fp8a3vo.fsf@stephe-leake.org> References: <55BE209F.1000009@siege-engine.com> <55BE509B.2080307@yandex.ru> <87r3nkjxby.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> <55BF7619.1050701@yandex.ru> <87mvy8jvlh.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> <55BF8522.4010009@yandex.ru> <87lhdsys13.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> <55BFF764.2030002@yandex.ru> <83mvy7tbit.fsf@gnu.org> <55C0FEEB.7040500@yandex.ru> <83h9oeudfs.fsf@gnu.org> <55C1074E.90103@yandex.ru> <83d1z2uach.fsf@gnu.org> <55C11D54.9090105@yandex.ru> <83bnemtpop.fsf@gnu.org> <55C1DA6F.1000209@yandex.ru> <86k2t8c16a.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55C33609.3020807@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1438871308 9103 80.91.229.3 (6 Aug 2015 14:28:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 14:28:28 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 06 16:28:15 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNM9T-0005NN-Lv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 16:28:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45388 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNM9T-0004tf-0E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 10:28:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47818) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNM9O-0004sx-5a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 10:28:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNM9K-0002wd-4L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 10:28:06 -0400 Original-Received: from gproxy10-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([69.89.20.226]:58093) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNM9J-0002vw-Tu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 10:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 4950 invoked by uid 0); 6 Aug 2015 14:27:59 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw2) (10.0.90.83) by gproxy10.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 6 Aug 2015 14:27:59 -0000 Original-Received: from host114.hostmonster.com ([74.220.207.114]) by cmgw2 with id 1STp1r00n2UdiVW01STsPK; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 08:27:57 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=O9qq4nNW c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=CQdxDb2CKd3SRg4I0/XZPQ==:117 a=CQdxDb2CKd3SRg4I0/XZPQ==:17 a=DsvgjBjRAAAA:8 a=f5113yIGAAAA:8 a=9i_RQKNPAAAA:8 a=y7kgw_RnJtkA:10 a=hEr_IkYJT6EA:10 a=x_XPkuGwIRMA:10 a=uRRa74qj2VoA:10 a=vaJtXVxTAAAA:8 a=uGh8sryJcpu0Ow_EZrMA:9 Original-Received: from [76.218.37.33] (port=52972 helo=TAKVER2) by host114.hostmonster.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNM99-0002uG-Kv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 08:27:51 -0600 In-Reply-To: <55C33609.3020807@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Thu, 6 Aug 2015 13:25:13 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (windows-nt) X-Identified-User: {2442:host114.hostmonster.com:stephele:stephe-leake.org} {sentby:smtp auth 76.218.37.33 authed with stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org} X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 69.89.20.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:188498 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: > On 08/06/2015 10:43 AM, Stephen Leake wrote: > >> Since we are discussing core Emacs functionality, you should be clearer >> about this. There is a big difference between: > > I doesn't seem particularly useful, and I don't want to work on it. > But there's no reason to assume that I'm going to veto it (do I even > have a veto power?), if someone's going to implement it in a clean > way. > >> Personally, I use 'make' much more than I use cross reference tools, so >> yes, build is more useful. > > You can still run 'make' in the console, `next-error' is a very powerful Emacs feature; nothing equivalent is available in a console. -- -- Stephe