>>> > Should we make `char-fold-to-regexp' into a command and refer to it
>>> > from here? Or add something like `char-fold-show-equivalences'?
>>>
>>> A better name would be `describe-char-fold'.
>>
>> For a command, I'd say describe-character-foldings.  But
>> char-fold-show-equivalences is IMO a better name.
>
> All similar commands have names starting with the `describe-' prefix like
> `describe-char', `describe-character-set'.  So maybe then
> `describe-char-fold-equivalences'.

Ok, then let's use describe-char-fold-equivalences: