From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix display-buffer-use-some-window to honor reusable-frames Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 19:48:35 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <867cx5cksc.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <834jsccepb.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14848"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Tom Gillespie , emacs-devel@gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 29 19:33:26 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pMCUX-0003hu-SY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 19:33:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pMCU3-0003Ay-Gf; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 13:32:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pMCU1-0003Ab-Ua for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 13:32:54 -0500 Original-Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:dc4:8::221]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pMCU0-00076q-Bx; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 13:32:53 -0500 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A02B240003; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 18:32:37 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (martin rudalics's message of "Sat, 28 Jan 2023 11:46:30 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:4b98:dc4:8::221; envelope-from=juri@linkov.net; helo=relay1-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:302755 Archived-At: > One thing we could do is to add a new action alist entry say > 'bump-use-time'. People could use this to indicate that they want to > display several buffers in a row. 'window--display-buffer' would then > bump the use time of the window it uses when ALIST contains that entry. > I have no idea how this would work in practice. I think this is a nice idea. Another action alist entry could also define whether to use 'lru' or 'mru', thus obsoleting display-buffer-use-least-recent-window and avoiding other code duplication.