From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Question about `apropos-variable' Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2024 14:27:54 +0300 Message-ID: <867capzarp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86plohzo3q.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36653"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michelangelo Rodriguez Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 03 13:28:45 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1swK0j-0009OV-H2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2024 13:28:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1swJzz-0002lB-AJ; Thu, 03 Oct 2024 07:27:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1swJzy-0002l2-Ax for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2024 07:27:58 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1swJzy-0006Tu-2c; Thu, 03 Oct 2024 07:27:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=Ps0OVuyLMfIpd/9YBdb2tKRe/yu9+G/Z75SifcEjbl8=; b=M1qaymStGNZr Mu79BaCa/FN2gXBrw4QP+pHsXfHfTxrLSXSU+cAbOuXUVzOUIDROcY9x1e3xsUyQgPtpLsD6LaZ7Q 06xXaJQuQe1mkM2tbwUtb1kmLY/f7aI+LVtWWCPnKigml81M0OB5NOGAV3OjtsH0GGU9345iLbmNx PSSATSI7iggVm8LrGf7CogV20v36I/2jOghhVQpybwulMb+txC3pKmm5erwo7q7nudJKyR67BSi1h EKDD4ULRGhnKTE70u+88U2XO1Q3p1nUP/iJ8nT7giSgj0Av9uql0dx19JL5UvrHUmtOmJfktTVe/W RmBlKpwuJIJBcuv7JJzeRw==; In-Reply-To: (message from Michelangelo Rodriguez on Thu, 03 Oct 2024 11:26:38 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:324283 Archived-At: > From: Michelangelo Rodriguez > Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2024 11:26:38 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> From: Michelangelo Rodriguez > >> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2024 03:39:20 +0200 > >> > >> It is correct to assert that `apropos-variable' function generates a > >> match item in "*apropos*" buffer only if a variable is documented? > > > > Looks that way, yes. Not sure whether this is a bug or a feature. > `apropos-function' lists all functions matching a pattern. Yes, the code for functions is explicitly different.