From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: An anonymous IRC user's opinion Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 21:55:45 +0200 Message-ID: <867c8xsmri.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86v7x2u7rz.fsf@gnu.org> <86msidubg4.fsf@gnu.org> <867c9htwt7.fsf@gnu.org> <387887a4-ba19-485e-8805-d1aabe2058ff@gutov.dev> <86y11xsbil.fsf@gnu.org> <17465b85-430a-4e91-8b12-769b60181ada@gutov.dev> <86ses4sglw.fsf@gnu.org> <86fro4sddd.fsf@gnu.org> <6ac73c67-cb2d-48ef-8f1d-683c5335aba5@gutov.dev> <8634k4s2r2.fsf@gnu.org> <082b0388-b3a1-4523-9f9b-5ead4b110e11@gutov.dev> <86plmrtemx.fsf@gnu.org> <7aa4a684-3374-4d0f-8efc-c4df29337c5e@gutov.dev> <86cyirtahu.fsf@gnu.org> <556779b3-9308-4fd3-9050-bf9c49658cd1@gutov.dev> <864j43t8t9.fsf@gnu.org> <4cc676e8-cac5-4348-99b0-243baf74687e@gutov.dev> <8634jnt5e3.fsf@gnu.org> <4864104c-cb23-4356-ad89-2fea111db66c@gutov.dev> <86ttc2rrh8.fsf@gnu.org> <86cyipsp94.fsf@gnu.org> <9cd17f8b-f88c-49f6-9024-0b6d297e18ac@gutov.dev> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35894"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: johan.myreen@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 20 20:56:36 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tDqoV-0009BB-H4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 20:56:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tDqnn-0005Qy-UQ; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:55:51 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tDqnm-0005Qg-80 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:55:50 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tDqnl-0002UC-P3; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:55:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=KuerXsLiIh/4B7exR172Au4dW6aoi7jyC2PFpDDYH5A=; b=e2/sIFGU6SbC mSJTcDiYuAg6vldwpsSvCjUnobleelaOxGmHRtskH4Ug7pgoYgHyTv3zQbYWauwCSlJAm+4f/polI L2ix/VsY5wJDS4XVAcOUMlj52l410U7wW+8pp9bizjuCmurEZREFYC0wxm3NZ7o5/8W+6rTKCLi0p R8Q1goVaLtsxGHWtnb0GIzHqXU6465y8zTF+CX6YqE7IqZhmmCqAD26V0zTPTWCaoyQB9ddN/fUET 1KX8U+DoLznQEj4UOWZI7oO4zo/HsS8Dubduh7Mrt/lMh0RsKGnioLGi0z0BukGKqEcBf9JKet8Fy PsxG3L35qKz+o16DcRZUQw==; In-Reply-To: <9cd17f8b-f88c-49f6-9024-0b6d297e18ac@gutov.dev> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Wed, 20 Nov 2024 21:23:56 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:325532 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 21:23:56 +0200 > Cc: johan.myreen@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > > >> I'm fine with that idea, but it'd seem like a change in paradigm. > > > > Yes, indeed. So I think it has to be an optional feature, and we > > should offer more "direct" ways for expressing such preferences. > > Such as a user option called treesit-enable-modes? Something like that, yes. Because no better idea was presented. > >>>> and not a replacement for the current setup. > >>> > >>> What current setup? > >> > >> Please look at the patch in > >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2024-11/msg00515.html, > >> the current setup is on the lines being removed, and the proposed one is > >> on the lines being added. > > > > Then I don't understand why you say modifying auto-mode-alist is not a > > replacement. That's what we did in Emacs 29, just less cleanly. > > I said that "helpers in the Customize interface, or a command which > would prompt for mode, for file extension(s), and then customize > auto-mode-alist based on that" would not be ... "a replacement for the > current setup", which you seem to confirm in the latest messages. I do?