From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andy Moreton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bignum branch Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2018 12:14:02 +0100 Message-ID: <86600qgz9h.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87o9fbbw1t.fsf@tromey.com> <86in5jdj49.fsf@gmail.com> <83wotxaiwi.fsf@gnu.org> <86k1pxmvmx.fsf@gmail.com> <87efg4a9xc.fsf@tromey.com> <87a7qr8cz7.fsf@tromey.com> <86tvoy3je9.fsf@gmail.com> <86bmb0vbxf.fsf@gmail.com> <87k1pnfcg1.fsf@tromey.com> <86sh4b1833.fsf@gmail.com> <861sbgz3dm.fsf@gmail.com> <83a7q4ufxp.fsf@gnu.org> <86in4resc8.fsf@gmail.com> <831sbfvl11.fsf@gnu.org> <8636vv7ohh.fsf@gmail.com> <83y3dntwsw.fsf@gnu.org> <83wot7tkdh.fsf@gnu.org> <86efffgr9h.fsf@gmail.com> <83o9eiu0d6.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1533381142 24797 195.159.176.226 (4 Aug 2018 11:12:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2018 11:12:22 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (windows-nt) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 04 13:12:18 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fluTo-0006JM-Cu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 13:12:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54653 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fluVt-0003wD-4N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 07:14:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53538) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fluVk-0003w8-Cn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 07:14:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fluVh-0007V9-8D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 07:14:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=43533 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fluVg-0007TX-Va for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 07:14:13 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fluTY-00060i-2q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 13:12:00 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 26 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:TfBzGIbjkYVpOdP4B/a5+L8Hfhk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:228151 Archived-At: On Sat 04 Aug 2018, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Andy Moreton >> Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2018 20:54:34 +0100 >> >> If I apply the following from master to the bignum branch then a 32bit >> MinGW build succeeds: >> >> 024d20f81e ("Fix compilation with mingw.org's MinGW 5.x headers") >> bd52f37cae ("Fix last change: only MinGW runtime 5.0.2 and later needs >> that.") > > That's a surprise: I thought MinGW64 uses its own headers for 32-bit > builds, whereas the above commits fix problems specific to mingw.org's > headers. At the time, I looked at the MinGW64 headers, and my > conclusion was that this particular problem doesn't exist there. We are miscommunicating. The MSYS2 mingw64 builds (i686 and x86_64) all work correctly. The problem is with the MinGW (mingw.org, i686 only) builds. This would all be a lot less confusing if the two unreleated projects had chosen more distinctive names. AndyM