From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Task Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [NonGNU Elpa] New package: ETT Date: Wed, 03 May 2023 15:06:13 -0300 Message-ID: <865y99b824.fsf@disroot.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11962"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 03 20:28:28 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1puHDH-0002vL-3c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 May 2023 20:28:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1puHCg-0005TN-R7; Wed, 03 May 2023 14:27:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1puGus-0005iU-FW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 May 2023 14:09:26 -0400 Original-Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1puGuq-0006IH-D9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 May 2023 14:09:26 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D061940252; Wed, 3 May 2023 20:09:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Original-Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fUydanByae5n; Wed, 3 May 2023 20:09:20 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1683137360; bh=U/kMjSq+3FO6+ZWIggIKbKhW5epQc5yu6mIzXfHukKk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Date; b=mRbsS5AUzNRdZGIHCXIMKX4+OeCVonxQwam+njWISGojzr45V7JQSiXom0wo9dTgg +yfPNxJ03BLdra1UnUehh5s4pHHVTwv4C98a0b42fNodYrTciVez5HoPB80g8MYt+J CzUc6WgOrNIGHR+j3HmPXZ8sEloWcPDVDyjdj3e+hZTs3MVSeREQ/AYPHBIZESUGOJ mSYVH/eRFXjgsYG7SD0sjaeAvBKn2hRmwr5LGENo8wbCG7eEEln2wRQKNyClzKzW5E Zr4toyhtkloZ7+5aT4De5wxgtY6p6J7EGYaMXfj9NGSvFvjzo/JiPJkxwVPqfgjoYK dYFExAHa5QStA== In-Reply-To: 87a5ylcqq6.fsf@posteo.net Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.21.23.139; envelope-from=q01@disroot.org; helo=knopi.disroot.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 03 May 2023 14:27:46 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:305797 Archived-At: Philip Kaludercic writes: > If that is so, I would explain that in the documentation string, but > what I wonder is why if condition is needed. All you basically do is > avoid converting num1 to a float, and the result remains a integer, in > some cases. Oh, I get what you mean now. Well, back when I coded this I prefered the result being an integer when the result was exact. It simplified some maths for me. However, nowadays this function is used only four times in the code, so I probably don't need that fallback anymore. > While this will calculate the values in constant time, > > (list (floor time 60) (% time 60)) > > a loop will always take more iterations depending on the value of the input: > > (let ((hr 0)) > (while (>= time 60) > (setq hr (1+ hr) > time (- time 60))) > (list hr time)) Amazing. Thanks! Best regards.