From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 30 Release? Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 14:20:47 +0300 Message-ID: <865xre9u9c.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y14pr1qw.fsf@librehacker.com> <86r0ahtdve.fsf@gnu.org> <8734mwzfac.fsf@librehacker.com> <86cym0sb0i.fsf@gnu.org> <8734mwny95.fsf@librehacker.com> <87zfozfcb4.fsf@librehacker.com> <86a5gzjht0.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25242"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: pinmacs@cas.cat Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 02 13:21:50 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sl581-0006RV-V7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2024 13:21:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sl57F-0006sQ-CU; Mon, 02 Sep 2024 07:21:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sl57B-0006rw-Or for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2024 07:20:57 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sl57A-0006YN-C5; Mon, 02 Sep 2024 07:20:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=vuyVG69mwAPCxxM74ASleZ04QmRE8sDC1x1wVPl7jB4=; b=QZkNUjSntKQY 2qdk97O/6fbjijvfExr2NMx6araQ8V2Z1Aoui1dX94nzU/e9JKP5L3tIlaGIscr0/4Qh03/SCbKK+ HaR0d2cvKt3YgUuLdvfvU5wwMh1T0Q6weTNgpEdCUcRQcxeZvSUCEGYU+ZXTInKQj78JF4txPW1Ga StKvbI/iVJrA9ks3gT4wBw2BYibsoYFA7f3DKqMi6j9e61u8uweE+FsSFQ1hQODcV2eMiMt6N0Ol/ bKm+eWg4sm/tqdOp1emfe6nAHpHT5/u+yqfNfs8rxOS+AWSKRnvk83hC7rNxMl10EJPq9H6U083qF VWN4PuyWdlxEqAACyEMcAQ==; In-Reply-To: (pinmacs@cas.cat) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:323276 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2024 22:15:59 +0200 > From: pinmacs@cas.cat > > Please be explicit if this kind of reports are useful They are, thank you very much. > Overall experience: Compiled emacs-30 branch on 2024-08-23 with commit > 44c2614. I am using it since then: works better in general, I perceive > it faster and more stable. I dedicated an effort of around 3 hours of > upgrading the additional packages, looking at the news on emacs and > orgmode. I am very happy that I did it, and thank you. > > In my case, it is possible that the next time I will search for a new > version is in the next holidays/christmas, or in summer. I feel this is > great (even better than emacs 29) for my production workflow > > Compiled it with this options (as I am user of debian stable i3wm with X11): > > ./configure --with-native-compilation --with-native-compilation=aot > --with-x-toolkit=lucid > > Failed the part of `make -j4`. But worked with `make bootstrap` (as > suggested by the compilation error) [1] > > FYI, my init.el file has 6347 lines, which installs 48 packages and has > a lot of small programs > > After the upgrade, one package, pass, stopped to work, but I know it was > time to upgrade all the packages. That's what package.el suggested, and > it went fine, except that autoremove removed again all the packages > installed? Solved reinstalling all the packages again, but saying no to > autoremove > > I encountered 2 minor issues with orgmode that I will report in the > corresponding list; even if that issues cannot be solved, I am very > happy on everything as is :) > > The last one that I encountered today is that I could not benefit from > the new and nice use-package-vc [2] feature. That is because my compiled > emacs comes from previous versions and usage, and it looks like I was > using a very old use-package version instead of the built-in, so I could > not set up this stuff until I removed the old package Thanks, much appreciated.