From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Prefer to split along the longest edge Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 18:55:26 +0200 Message-ID: <865xnhlym9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r06a3yfg.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87zfkx2ydr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <8734io2hac.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86pllrpn2p.fsf@gnu.org> <87ikrjfrq3.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86jzbzphu0.fsf@gnu.org> <87ikrjcue1.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86frmnpfoq.fsf@gnu.org> <87ikrihkgc.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <1fa88791-a5be-4897-a3fb-dbf0be5782c5@gmx.at> <86ikrio2lf.fsf@gnu.org> <89d19d67-cf76-4441-b8d6-c30e6f8118d9@gmx.at> <86ed25m653.fsf@gnu.org> <028d6693-4fee-4410-9e5c-c5a4b0418f60@gmx.at> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7971"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: nicolas.despres@gmail.com, juri@linkov.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 18 17:56:17 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tNxLM-0001pO-IB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 17:56:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNxKm-0007JZ-HH; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 11:55:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNxKk-0007JH-7D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 11:55:38 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNxKi-00081Z-I9; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 11:55:36 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=GDPJrqvnOItX6sBlnB6OvRB2pjk+wbjQhLO3WLfoMnU=; b=KjMX12X37Gzi jSZUJAT9+2uofaJxSOx1PGav5Yk9RZB4iDx0I3PB+GFWPQxmRxPZOcQKqNFbwPCu4i2lH6OHCU3YP 7wFFY/095ZKIyNaTkYgaT5aodFFhIEt+No5bNJnMPwDc0M3d2pgeQ5UQbwstYv+K9oDWj0Y538vGD XhiUO2btdiCgWJEsRS1rWpnXQUb6recUqyLonGw9J3g5Z78GoujrazCngibe3Sl9+0wsQm9BxVTxG xkGQX65K0zRF2HuOYG+du2VMmZ/Uo72zfJJXrle4AO4eGv9xFcvVRVQWGk9Ynch5pVbaeq04s4PGQ P7h0FO5BT+wSdHr1WDg5yw==; In-Reply-To: <028d6693-4fee-4410-9e5c-c5a4b0418f60@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Wed, 18 Dec 2024 17:24:58 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:326669 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 17:24:58 +0100 > Cc: nicolas.despres@gmail.com, juri@linkov.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: martin rudalics > > > To clarify: I was talking only about this particular toggle, not about > > "other display-buffer options". The difference is that those other > > options already exist, so removing or redesigning them is not easy at > > best, and thus probably isn't worth our while. > > Which _toggle_ do you mean? The option we were discussing, split-window-preferred-direction. > The option we were talking about here is > > There is another aspect that still can't be customized. > The choice of the window to split is hard-coded > in 'display-buffer-pop-up-window'. It's either > the largest window or lru: > > and the primary client of such an option would be probably the program > calling 'display-buffer' and not the user. Sorry, I lost you: what does display-buffer-pop-up-window have to do with the subject of this thread? I'm probably missing something.