From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this? Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 11:31:47 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <864p60213g.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <20080729222754.GC2208@muc.de> <86myjx3lt8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <48921019.6030308@gmail.com> <8663qk3g0w.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87y73giryj.fsf@elegiac.orebokech.com> <86iquk1nsk.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87abftq5w0.fsf@elegiac.orebokech.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1217867245 10096 80.91.229.12 (4 Aug 2008 16:27:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 16:27:25 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 04 18:28:16 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KQ2ut-0006c2-Av for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:28:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57021 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KQ2ty-00011d-8w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:27:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQ2tt-0000yw-4K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:27:13 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQ2ts-0000xx-EZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:27:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54018 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KQ2ts-0000xe-8X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:27:12 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:44854 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KQ2ts-0001wk-3G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:27:12 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KQ2to-0006mG-RY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:27:09 +0000 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.130 ([38.98.147.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:27:08 +0000 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:27:08 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 25 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.130 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:qBji1XfIOEpvKKD0sNb0iUdtGJc= X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:102045 Archived-At: On Sun, 03 Aug 2008 21:02:07 +0200 Romain Francoise wrote: RF> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> I can set mine up on Ubuntu 6.x and 7.x and MacOS X. [...] I'll >> do --with-ns, --without-x, and --with-x on MacOS X and just the >> latter two on the Ubuntu systems. RF> There seems to be some confusion here: are you proposing to set up a RF> new master instance, or to provide build slaves for my master? New master. RF> If the latter, the commands are defined by the master and you don't RF> need any config file. I want to use the commands you use for your master, to ensure we are consistently testing the same things. RF> Actually, now that I think about it, we should probably redo the RF> configuration from scratch and have separate masters for the trunk RF> and the 22 branch, as Python does... Works for me too. Ted